Prediction of Reverse Remodeling at Cardiac MR Imaging Soon after First ST-Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Results of a Large Prospective Registry
Authors:
- Vicente BodiVBVicente Bodi
- Jose V. MonmeneuJMJose V. Monmeneu
- Jose T. Ortiz-PerezJOJose T. Ortiz-Perez
- Maria P. Lopez-LereuMLMaria P. Lopez-Lereu
- Clara BonanadCBClara Bonanad
- Oliver HusserOHOliver Husser
- Gemma MinanaGMGemma Minana
- Cristina GomezCGCristina Gomez
- Julio NunezJNJulio Nunez
- Maria J. FortezaMFMaria J. Forteza
- Arantxa HervasAHArantxa Hervas
- Elena de DiosEDElena de Dios
- 1 January 2016
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) in Radiology
- Vol. 278 (1) , 54-63
Abstract
To assess predictors of reverse remodeling by using cardiac magnetic resonance (MR) imaging soon after ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Written informed consent was obtained from all patients, and the study protocol was approved by the institutional committee on human research, ensuring that it conformed to the ethical guidelines of the 1975 Declaration of Helsinki. Five hundred seven patients (mean age, 58 years; age range, 24-89 years) with a first STEMI were prospectively studied. Infarct size and microvascular obstruction (MVO) were quantified at late gadolinium-enhanced imaging. Reverse remodeling was defined as a decrease in left ventricular (LV) end-systolic volume index (LVESVI) of more than 10% from 1 week to 6 months after STEMI. For statistical analysis, a simple (from a clinical perspective) multiple regression model preanalyzing infarct size and MVO were applied via univariate receiver operating characteristic techniques. Patients with reverse remodeling (n = 211, 42%) had a lesser extent (percentage of LV mass) of 1-week infarct size (mean ± standard deviation: 18% ± 13 vs 23% ± 14) and MVO (median, 0% vs 0%; interquartile range, 0%-1% vs 0%-4%) than those without reverse remodeling (n = 296, 58%) (P < .001 in pairwise comparisons). The independent predictors of reverse remodeling were infarct size (odds ratio, 0.98; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.97, 0.99; P = .04) and MVO (odds ratio, 0.92; 95% CI: 0.86, 0.99; P = .03). Once infarct size and MVO were dichotomized by using univariate receiver operating characteristic techniques, the only independent predictor of reverse remodeling was the presence of simultaneous nonextensive infarct-size MVO (infarct size < 30% of LV mass and MVO < 2.5% of LV mass) (odds ratio, 3.2; 95% CI: 1.8, 5.7; P < .001). Assessment of infarct size and MVO with cardiac MR imaging soon after STEMI enables one to make a decision in the prediction of reverse remodeling.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comprehensive Prognosis Assessment by CMR Imaging After ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial InfarctionJACC, 2014
- Reversing heart failure by CRT: how long do the effects last?European Heart Journal, 2013
- Long-term impact of cardiac resynchronization therapy in mild heart failure: 5-year results from the REsynchronization reVErses Remodeling in Systolic left vEntricular dysfunction (REVERSE) studyEuropean Heart Journal, 2013
- Myocardial Recovery and the Failing HeartJACC, 2012
- Novel therapeutic approaches to post-infarction remodellingCardiovascular Research, 2012
- Reverse remodeling in heart failure—mechanisms and therapeutic opportunitiesNature Reviews Cardiology, 2011
- Reverse Remodeling With Left Ventricular Assist DevicesCirculation: Heart Failure, 2011
- Myocardial Reverse RemodelingCardiovascular Therapeutics, 2010
- Myocardial remodeling after infarction: the role of myofibroblastsNature Reviews Cardiology, 2009
- Heart FailureNew England Journal of Medicine, 2003