A Comparative Analysis of Cryopreserved Versus Prehydrated Human Acellular Dermal Matrices in Tissue Expander Breast Reconstruction
Authors:
- Scott PersingSPScott Persing
- Caitlin M. ConnorCCCaitlin M. Connor
- Armando DavilaADArmando Davila
- Elliot HirschEHElliot Hirsch
- Neil A. FineNFNeil A. Fine
- John Y.S. KimJKJohn Y.S. Kim
- 1 June 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Annals of Plastic Surgery
- Vol. 70 (6) , 632-635
Abstract
The use of human acellular dermal matrices (HADMs) in breast reconstruction has become routine practice for many reconstructive surgeons. Comparative studies between 2 more common iterations of human acellular dermis are scarce. Our study evaluated reconstructive outcomes of cryopreserved and prehydrated HADMs in comparative fashion. This study is a retrospective review of 369 consecutive tissue expander breast reconstructions performed by 2 board-certified plastic surgeons whose practice focuses on breast reconstruction. Data were collected independently by 2 reviewers, and a comparative analysis for statistical significance of outcomes was performed using the Fisher exact test, 2-tailed independent t tests, and regression analysis where appropriate. Over a 5-year period, 255 patients (369 breasts) underwent breast reconstruction utilizing either cryopreserved or prehydrated HADM. Of the total, 136 breasts received cryopreserved and 233 breasts received prehydrated HADMs. The total complication rates for cryopreserved and prehydrated HADMs were 19.1% and 19.3% (P = 1.0), respectively. Additional complication rates were calculated for flap necrosis (8.1% vs 9.0%, P = 0.849), infection requiring intravenous antibiotics (10.3% vs 5.2%, P = 0.09), hematoma (2.9% vs 1.3%, P = 0.431), seroma (2.2% vs 1.0%, P = 1.0), expander exposure/dehiscence (5.9% vs 6.4%, P = 1.0), and number of breasts requiring autologous reconstruction after a complication (4.4% vs 6.4%, P = 0.491). On regression analysis, HADM type was not an independent risk factor for any complication subtype. The results of this study suggest that there are no significant differences in complication rates between cryopreserved and prehydrated HADMs.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Tissue Expander Breast Reconstruction Using Prehydrated Human Acellular DermisAnnals of Plastic Surgery, 2011
- Postoperative Complications in Prosthesis-Based Breast Reconstruction Using Acellular Dermal MatrixPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 2011
- Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction Using Acellular Dermal Matrix and the Risk of Postoperative ComplicationsPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 2010
- Acellular Dermis–Assisted Prosthetic Breast Reconstruction versus Complete Submuscular Coverage: A Head-to-Head Comparison of OutcomesPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 2009
- AlloDerm Performance in the Setting of Prosthetic Breast Surgery, Infection, and IrradiationPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 2009
- Early Results Using Sterilized Acellular Human Dermis (NeoForm) in Postmastectomy Tissue Expander Breast ReconstructionPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 2009
- Acellular Dermis-Assisted Breast ReconstructionAesthetic Plastic Surgery, 2008
- Use of acellular cadaveric dermis and tissue expansion in postmastectomy breast reconstructionJournal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery, 2007
- Inferolateral AlloDerm Hammock for Implant Coverage in Breast ReconstructionAnnals of Plastic Surgery, 2007
- Nonexpansive Immediate Breast Reconstruction Using Human Acellular Tissue Matrix Graft (AlloDerm)Annals of Plastic Surgery, 2006