Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison of the Efficacy of Apalutamide and Enzalutamide with ADT in the Treatment of Non-Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer
Authors:
Open Access
- 7 December 2019
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Advances in Therapy
- Vol. 37 (1) , 501-511
Abstract
Introduction Apalutamide and enzalutamide are next-generation androgen receptor inhibitors that demonstrated efficacy in placebo-controlled studies (SPARTAN for apalutamide; PROSPER for enzalutamide) when used in combination with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for treatment of non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC). In the absence of comparative studies between these agents, the present study sought to indirectly compare metastasis-free survival (MFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with nmCRPC who received these therapies. Methods Individual patient-level data from SPARTAN (apalutamide plus ADT) and published data from PROSPER (enzalutamide plus ADT) were utilized. An anchored matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) was conducted by weighting the patients from the SPARTAN study to match baseline characteristics reported for PROSPER. Hazard ratios (HRs) for MFS and OS were re-estimated for SPARTAN using weighted Cox proportional hazards models and indirectly compared with those of PROSPER using a Bayesian network meta-analysis. Results From the SPARTAN population (N = 1207), a total of 1171 patients were matched to the PROSPER population (N = 1401). The recalculated HRs (95% confidence interval) for apalutamide versus ADT based on the reweighted SPARTAN data to mimic the PROSPER patient population were 0.26 (0.21; 0.33) for MFS and 0.62 (0.41; 0.94) for OS. MAIC-based HRs (95% credible interval) for apalutamide versus enzalutamide were 0.91 (0.68; 1.22) for MFS and 0.77 (0.46; 1.30) for OS. The Bayesian probabilities of apalutamide being more effective than enzalutamide were 73.6% for MFS and 83.5% for OS. Conclusions MAIC results suggest that nmCRPC patients treated with apalutamide have a higher probability of a more favorable MFS and OS compared with those treated with enzalutamide.Keywords
Funding Information
- Janssen Research and Development
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Simulation and Matching-Based Approaches for Indirect Comparison of TreatmentsPharmacoEconomics, 2015
- One-year and long-term molecular response to nilotinib and dasatinib for newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia: a matching-adjusted indirect comparisonCurrent Medical Research and Opinion, 2014
- Enzalutamide in Metastatic Prostate Cancer before ChemotherapyNew England Journal of Medicine, 2014
- Phase I Study of ARN-509, a Novel Antiandrogen, in the Treatment of Castration-Resistant Prostate CancerJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2013
- Comparative Efficacy of Guanfacine Extended Release Versus Atomoxetine for the Treatment of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder in Children and Adolescents: Applying Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison MethodologyCNS Drugs, 2013
- Evidence Synthesis for Decision Making 2Medical Decision Making, 2012
- Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparisons: A New Tool for Timely Comparative Effectiveness ResearchValue in Health, 2012
- Interpreting Indirect Treatment Comparisons and Network Meta-Analysis for Health-Care Decision Making: Report of the ISPOR Task Force on Indirect Treatment Comparisons Good Research Practices: Part 1Value in Health, 2011
- Estimating the Power of Indirect Comparisons: A Simulation StudyPLOS ONE, 2011
- Maintenance of Intratumoral Androgens in Metastatic Prostate Cancer: A Mechanism for Castration-Resistant Tumor GrowthCancer Research, 2008