SARS-CoV-2 RNA Recovery from Air Sampled on Quartz Fiber Filters: A Matter of Sample Preservation?
Authors:
- Sabina LicenSabina Licen
- Luisa ZupinLuisa Zupin
- Lorenzo MartelloLorenzo Martello
- Valentina TorboliValentina Torboli
- Sabrina SemeraroSabrina Semeraro
- Anna Lilian GardossiAnna Lilian Gardossi
- Enrico GrecoEnrico Greco
- Francesco FontanaFrancesco Fontana
- Sergio CrovellaSergio Crovella
- Maurizio RuscioMaurizio Ruscio
- Jolanda PalmisaniJolanda Palmisani
- Alessia Di GilioAlessia Di Gilio
Open Access
- 17 February 2022
- journal article
- research article
- Published by MDPI AG in Atmosphere
- Vol. 13 (2) , 340
Abstract
The airborne route of transmission of SARS-CoV-2 was confirmed by the World Health Organization in April 2021. There is an urge to establish standardized protocols for assessing the concentration of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in air samples to support risk assessment, especially in indoor environments. Debates on the airborne transmission route of SARS-CoV-2 have been complicated because, among the studies testing the presence of the virus in the air, the percentage of positive samples has often been very low. In the present study, we report preliminary results on a study for the evaluation of parameters that can influence SARS-CoV-2 RNA recovery from quartz fiber filters spotted either by standard single-stranded SARS-CoV-2 RNA or by inactivated SARS-CoV-2 virions. The analytes were spiked on filters and underwent an active or passive sampling; then, they were preserved at −80 °C for different numbers of days (0 to 54) before extraction and analysis. We found a mean recovery of 2.43%, except for the sample not preserved (0 days) that showed a recovery of 13.51%. We found a relationship between the number of days and the recovery percentage. The results presented show a possible issue that relates to the quartz matrix and SARS-CoV-2 RNA recovery. The results are in accordance with the already published studies that described similar methods for SARS-CoV-2 RNA field sampling and that reported non-detectable concentrations of RNA. These outcomes could be false negatives due to sample preservation conditions. Thus, until further investigation, we suggest, as possible alternatives, to keep the filters: (i) in a sealed container for preservation at 4 °C; and (ii) in a viral transport medium for preservation at a temperature below 0 °C.Keywords
Funding Information
- University of Trieste (University of Trieste Atheneum Fund for scientific research (2021) and IRCCS Burlo Garofolo (RC47/20))
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Potential role of particulate matter in the spreading of COVID-19 in Northern Italy: first observational study based on initial epidemic diffusionBMJ Open, 2020
- SARS-Cov-2RNA found on particulate matter of Bergamo in Northern Italy: First evidenceEnvironmental Research, 2020
- It Is Time to Address Airborne Transmission of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)Clinical Infectious Diseases, 2020
- Airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2: The world should face the realityEnvironment International, 2020
- Can atmospheric pollution be considered a co-factor in extremely high level of SARS-CoV-2 lethality in Northern Italy?Environmental Pollution, 2020
- Laboratory study of bioaerosols: Traditional test systems, modern approaches, and environmental controlAerosol Science and Technology, 2019
- The Comprehensive R Archive NetworkWIREs Computational Statistics, 2012
- The Silica–Water Interface: How the Silanols Determine the Surface Acidity and Modulate the Water PropertiesJournal of Chemical Theory and Computation, 2012
- Collection and Preservation of Frozen Microorganisms2010
- Methods for long-term virus preservationMolecular Biotechnology, 1999