Comparison and interpretation of impressed marks left by a firearm on cartridge cases – Towards an operational implementation of a likelihood ratio based technique
Authors:
Open Access
- 1 August 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Forensic Science International
- Vol. 313, 110363
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cognitive biases in the peer review of bullet and cartridge case comparison casework: A field studyScience & Justice, 2020
- Validity and reliability of forensic firearm examinersForensic Science International, 2020
- Implementing context information management in forensic casework: Minimizing contextual bias in firearms examinationScience & Justice, 2016
- Implementing counter-measures against confirmation bias in forensic science.Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 2013
- The forensic confirmation bias: Problems, perspectives, and proposed solutions.Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 2013
- Painting the target around the matching profile: the Texas sharpshooter fallacy in forensic DNA interpretationLaw, Probability and Risk, 2009
- Sequential Unmasking: A Means of Minimizing Observer Effects in Forensic DNA InterpretationJournal of Forensic Sciences, 2008
- Contextual information renders experts vulnerable to making erroneous identificationsForensic Science International, 2006
- Three dimensional visualization and comparison of impressions on fired bulletsForensic Science International, 2004
- Context effects in forensic science: A review and application of the science of science to crime laboratory practice in the United StatesScience & Justice, 2003