Managing Late and Long-Term Effects Among Swedish Adolescents and Young Adults Affected by Cancer Following a Wilderness Intervention: Reconnecting with Self and Meaning Through Nature’s Unconditional Presence – A Qualitative Study
Open Access
- 19 January 2026
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Cancer Control
- Vol. 33
Abstract
Introduction: Adolescents and Young Adults (AYAs) affected by cancer are at risk of experiencing late and long-term effects following cancer diagnosis and treatment. While structured interventions have demonstrated potential benefits for well-being during the intervention itself, little is known about how AYAs affected by cancer engage with and experience nature in their everyday lives beyond the formal program context. The aim of this study was to explore how a selected group of AYAs affected by cancer—who had participated in a nature-based intervention (the WAYA program)—experience nature and its role in supporting and managing late and long-term effects of cancer and its treatment, beyond the context of the program itself. Method: This qualitative study explored the experiences of nature following the WAYA intervention among AYAs affected by cancer. Data were collected by focus group interviews at a three-month follow-up, using participant-selected photographs as visual prompts to elicit reflection on how nature supports management of late and long-term effects of cancer. A photovoice-inspired approach guided discussion questions and facilitated individual and collective meaning-making. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using qualitative content analysis. Results: The analysis of this study showed one theme: Reconnecting with self and meaning through nature’s unconditional presence—beyond human connection. The theme comprises the two categories Nature as a resource for inner balance and Nature as a meaningful companion , and five sub-categories : Managing by being mindful, Managing by experiencing rest and being calm, Experiencing metaphoric recognition, Sparking comfort, hope and positive emotions, and Nature as a space without obligations. Conclusion: This study explored how AYAs affected by cancer engage with nature beyond formal programs, revealing its potential in better management of late and long-term effects. These findings can inform low-threshold, personal meaningful, and sustainable approaches to clinical practice, well-being, and rehabilitation for this vulnerable group.Keywords
Funding Information
- Sjöbergstiftelsen (2024-01-04:10)
- Ekhagastiftelsen (2023-29)
- National Research Center in Complementary and Alternative Medicine
- Mittuniversitetet
- Sorlandet Hospital
- Universitetet i Agder
This publication has 55 references indexed in Scilit:
- Sample Size in Qualitative Interview StudiesQualitative Health Research, 2016
- How might contact with nature promote human health? Promising mechanisms and a possible central pathwayFrontiers in Psychology, 2015
- Global surveillance of cancer survival 1995–2009: analysis of individual data for 25 676 887 patients from 279 population-based registries in 67 countries (CONCORD-2)The Lancet, 2015
- The Journey of Recovery and Empowerment Embraced by Nature — Clients’ Perspectives on Nature-Based Rehabilitation in Relation to the Role of the Natural EnvironmentInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2014
- An Outdoor Adventure Program for Young Adults with Cancer: Positive Effects on Body Image and Psychosocial FunctioningJournal of Psychosocial Oncology, 2014
- Photovoice: A Review of the Literature in Health and Public HealthHealth Education & Behavior, 2009
- Physical and psychological long-term and late effects of cancerCancer, 2008
- Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groupsInternational Journal for Quality in Health Care, 2007
- Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthinessNurse Education Today, 2004
- Qualitative research: standards, challenges, and guidelinesThe Lancet, 2001