Comparing the persuasiveness of narrative and statistical evidence using meta‐analysis
Authors:
- 1 March 1997
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Communication Research Reports
- Vol. 14 (2) , 125-131
Abstract
This meta‐analysis compares the persuasiveness of using statistical versus narrative (example) evidence across 15 investigations. The results indicate that when comparing messages, statistical evidence is more persuasive than narrative evidence (r = .101).Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Temporal Effects of Story and Statistical Evidence on Belief ChangeCommunication Research, 1994
- The Utility of Exemplars in Persuasive CommunicationsCommunication Research, 1994
- The Impact of Enriching Case and Statistical Information on Consumer JudgmentsJournal of Consumer Research, 1982
- Insensitivity to sample bias: Generalizing from atypical cases.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1980
- The base-rate fallacy in probability judgmentsActa Psychologica, 1980
- The effects of base rates and individuating information on judgments about another personJournal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1980
- The Differential Impact of Abstract vs. Concrete Information on Decisions1Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1977
- Intuitive theories of events and the effects of base-rate information on prediction.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1977
- Judgments of recidivism risk: Conflicts between clinical strategies and base-rate information.Law and Human Behavior, 1977
- The effects of evidence in persuasive communicationCentral States Speech Journal, 1976