Developmental Language Disorder: Early Predictors, Age for the Diagnosis, and Diagnostic Tools. A Scoping Review
Authors:
- Alessandra SansaviniAlessandra Sansavini
- Maria Elena FavillaMFMaria Elena Favilla
- Maria Teresa GuastiMaria Teresa Guasti
- Andrea MariniAMAndrea Marini
- Stefania MillepiediSMStefania Millepiedi
- Maria Valeria Di MartinoMMMaria Valeria Di Martino
- Simona VecchiSVSimona Vecchi
- Nadia BattajonNBNadia Battajon
- Laura BertoloLBLaura Bertolo
- Olga CapirciOCOlga Capirci
- Barbara CarrettiBCBarbara Carretti
- Maria Paola ColateiMaria Paola Colatei
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 17 May 2021
- journal article
- review article
- Published by MDPI AG in Brain Sciences
- Vol. 11 (5) , 654
Abstract
Background. Developmental Language Disorder (DLD) is frequent in childhood and may have long-term sequelae. By employing an evidence-based approach, this scoping review aims at identifying (a) early predictors of DLD; (b) the optimal age range for the use of screening and diagnostic tools; (c) effective diagnostic tools in preschool children. Methods. We considered systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and primary observational studies with control groups on predictive, sensitivity and specificity values of screening and diagnostic tools and psycholinguistic measures for the assessment of DLD in preschool children. We identified 37 studies, consisting of 10 systematic reviews and 27 primary studies. Results. Delay in gesture production, receptive and/or expressive vocabulary, syntactic comprehension, or word combination up to 30 months emerged as early predictors of DLD, a family history of DLD appeared to be a major risk factor, and low socioeconomic status and environmental input were reported as risk factors with lower predictive power. Optimal time for screening is suggested between age 2 and 3, for diagnosis around age 4. Because of the high variability of sensitivity and specificity values, joint use of standardized and psycholinguistic measures is suggested to increase diagnostic accuracy. Conclusions. Monitoring risk situations and employing caregivers’ reports, clinical assessment and multiple linguistic measures are fundamental for an early identification of DLD and timely interventions.Keywords
This publication has 143 references indexed in Scilit:
- Adolescents with a history of specific language impairment (SLI): Strengths and difficulties in social, emotional and behavioral functioningResearch in Developmental Disabilities, 2013
- Severity of specific language impairment predicts delayed development in number skillsFrontiers in Psychology, 2013
- Working, declarative and procedural memory in specific language impairmentCortex, 2012
- Neural language networks at birthProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2011
- Early development of gestures, object-related-actions, word comprehension and word production, and their relationships in Italian infantsGesture, 2010
- Brain Mechanisms in Early Language AcquisitionNeuron, 2010
- Is Expressive Language Disorder an Accurate Diagnostic Category?American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 2009
- The Diagnostic Accuracy and Construct Validity of the Structured Photographic Expressive Language Test—Preschool: Second EditionLanguage, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 2009
- Late Language Emergence at 24 Months: An Epidemiological Study of Prevalence, Predictors, and CovariatesJournal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 2007
- The Denver Developmental Screening TestThe Journal of Pediatrics, 1967