Is the Use of Intraoperative Neuromonitoring Justified During Lumbar Anterior Approach Surgery?
Open Access
- 12 March 2024
- journal article
- research article
- Published by International Journal of Spine Surgery in International Journal of Spine Surgery
- Vol. 18 (2) , 217-221
Abstract
Background Intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) became widely used in spine surgery to reduce the risk of iatrogenic nerve injury. However, the proliferation of IONM has fallen into question based on effectiveness and costs, with a lack of evidence supporting its benefit for specific spine surgery procedures. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the use of IONM and the rate of neurological injury associated with anterior lumbar spinal surgery. Methods This was a retrospective study on a consecutive series of 359 patients undergoing lumbar anterior approach surgery for anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF), total disc replacement (TDR), or hybrid (ALIF with TDR) for the treatment of symptomatic disc degeneration. Patients undergoing any posterior spine surgery were excluded. Operative notes were reviewed to identify any changes in IONM and the surgeon’s response. Clinic notes were reviewed up to 3 months postoperatively for indications of iatrogenic nerve injury. Results There were 3 aberrant results with respect to IONM. Changes in IONM of a lower extremity occurred for 1 patient (0.3%). The surgeon evaluated the situation and there was no observable reason for the IONM change. Upon waking, the patient was found to have no neurological deficit. There were 2 cases of neurologic deficits in this population, which were classified as false-negatives of IONM (0.56%, 95% CI: 0.1% to 1.8%). In both cases, the patients were found to have a foot drop after the anterior approach surgery. Conclusion In this study, there was 1 false-positive and 2 false-negative results of IONM. These data suggest that IONM is not beneficial in this population. However, many surgeons may feel obligated to use IONM for medicolegal reasons. There is a need for future studies to delineate cases in which IONM is beneficial and the type of monitoring to use, if any, for specific spine surgery types. Clinical Relevance This study questions the routine use of IONM in anterior lumbar approach surgery for the treatment of symptomatic disc degeneration. This has significant implications related to the cost of this practice. Level of Evidence 4.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- How much are patients willing to pay for spine surgery? An evaluation of attitudes toward out-of-pocket expenses and cost-reducing measuresThe Spine Journal, 2023
- Utilization Trends of Intraoperative Neuromonitoring for Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion in New York StateSpine, 2022
- Neuromonitoring in Lateral Approaches for Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Systematic ReviewWorld Neurosurgery, 2022
- Should Somatosensory and Motor Evoked Potential Monitoring Be Used Routinely in All Posterior Cervical Operations for Degenerative Conditions of the Cervical Spine?World Neurosurgery, 2022
- Perioperative neurological deficits following anterior lumbar interbody fusion: Risk factors and clinical impactInterdisciplinary Neurosurgery, 2020
- Neurophysiological monitoring of spinal cord function during spinal deformity surgery: 2020 SRS neuromonitoring information statementSpine Deformity, 2020
- Intraoperative neuromonitoring for one-level lumbar discectomies is low yield and cost-ineffectiveJournal of Clinical Neuroscience, 2020
- Evolution of the Anterior Approach in Lumbar Spine FusionWorld Neurosurgery, 2019
- Approach-Related Complications of Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Results of a Combined Spine and Vascular Surgical TeamGlobal Spine Journal, 2015
- Functional Monitoring of Spinal Cord Activity During Spinal SurgeryClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 1973