Framing agency predicts design self‐efficacy and engineering identity, contributing to persistence intentions in and beyond the engineering degree
Authors:
- 27 April 2026
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Engineering Education
- Vol. 115 (2) , e70065
Abstract
Background: Commitment to degree and career are commonly connected to developing identity in the discipline and feelings of confidence (self‐efficacy) about disciplinary practices. While these psychosocial factors are well studied in engineering, they are less often linked to specific learning experiences. In design education, such experiences include framing agency —the ability to use one's agency to frame design problems. Purpose: We extend typical models of persistence intentions to examine the effects of engaging in design problem framing. We conjectured that framing agency relates to engineering identity and engineering design self‐efficacy. We sought to answer the following research questions: To what extent do framing agency constructs predict first‐year and senior students' design self‐efficacy, engineering identity, and persistence intentions? Does this vary for students from privileged and minoritized genders or from privileged and minoritized racial/ethnic groups? Methods: We used a previously tested survey to measure framing agency, engineering identity, engineering design self‐efficacy, persistence intentions, and demographics. We employed structural equation modeling on a national sample ( n = 636 first‐year students; n = 355 seniors). Results: Overall, engineering identity predicted persistence intentions for all students, but design self‐efficacy did not. Specific framing agency constructs, especially individual consequentiality, explained variance in self‐efficacy and identity across models. For women/non‐binary students, shared consequentiality predicted engineering identity and design self‐efficacy. For students from minoritized racial/ethnic groups, learning as consequentiality and individual consequentiality predicted career persistence intentions. Conclusions: Providing students with multiple opportunities to develop design problem framing skills may play a role in broadening participation.Keywords
Funding Information
- National Science Foundation (1751369)
This publication has 125 references indexed in Scilit:
- Identity, Critical Agency, and Engineering: An Affective Model for Predicting Engineering as a Career ChoiceJournal of Engineering Education, 2016
- Using Social Cognitive Career Theory to Assess Student Outcomes of Group Design Projects in StaticsJournal of Engineering Education, 2014
- Engineering Competence? An Interpretive Investigation of Engineering Students' Professional FormationJournal of Engineering Education, 2011
- Measuring Engineering Design Self‐EfficacyJournal of Engineering Education, 2010
- Women Engineering Students and Self‐Efficacy: A Multi‐Year, Multi‐Institution Study of Women Engineering Student Self‐EfficacyJournal of Engineering Education, 2009
- Becoming an Engineer: Toward a Three Dimensional View of Engineering LearningJournal of Engineering Education, 2008
- Factors Influencing the Self-Efficacy Beliefs of First-Year Engineering StudentsJournal of Engineering Education, 2006
- Engineering Design Thinking, Teaching, and LearningJournal of Engineering Education, 2005
- Gender and Ethnicity Differences in Freshmen Engineering Student Attitudes: A Cross‐Institutional Study*Journal of Engineering Education, 2001
- A Review of Literature on Teaching Engineering Design Through Project‐Oriented Capstone CoursesJournal of Engineering Education, 1997