Knee Arthroscopy Cohort Southern Denmark (KACS): protocol for a prospective cohort study
Open Access
Abstract
Background Meniscus surgery is a high-volume surgery carried out on 1 million patients annually in the USA. The procedure is conducted on an outpatient basis and the patients leave the hospital a few hours after surgery. A critical oversight of previous studies is their failure to account for the type of meniscal tears. Meniscus tears can be categorised as traumatic or non-traumatic. Traumatic tears (TT) are usually observed in younger, more active individuals in an otherwise ‘healthy’ meniscus and joint. Non-traumatic tears (NTT) (ie, degenerative tears) are typically observed in the middle-aged (35–55 years) and older population but the aetiology is largely unclear. Knowledge about the potential difference of the effect of arthroscopic meniscus surgery on patient symptoms between patients with traumatic and NTT is sparse. Furthermore, little is known about the natural time course of patient perceived pain, function and quality of life after meniscus surgery and factors affecting these outcomes. The aim of this prospective cohort study is to investigate the natural time course of patient-reported outcomes in patients undergoing meniscus surgery, with particular emphasis on the role of type of symptom onset. Methods/design This prospective cohort study enrol patients assigned for meniscus surgery. At the baseline (PRE surgery), patient characteristics are assessed using an email-based questionnaire also comprising several validated questionnaires assessing general health, knee-specific characteristics and patient's expectations of the surgery. Follow-up will be conducted at 12 and 52 weeks after meniscus surgery. The major outcomes will be differences in changes, from before to 52 weeks after surgery, in each of the five domains on the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) between patients undergoing surgery for traumatic compared with non-traumatic meniscus tears. Dissemination The study findings will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals and presented at national and international conferences. Trial registration number ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01871272.Keywords
This publication has 46 references indexed in Scilit:
- Arthroscopic partial meniscectomy in middle-aged patients with mild or no knee osteoarthritis: a protocol for a double-blind, randomized sham-controlled multi-centre trialBMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 2013
- Is arthroscopic surgery beneficial in treating non‐traumatic, degenerative medial meniscal tears? A five year follow‐upKnee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2012
- Meniscal Repair Versus Partial Meniscectomy: A Systematic Review Comparing Reoperation Rates and Clinical OutcomesArthroscopy, 2011
- Long-Term Outcome After Arthroscopic Meniscal Repair Versus Arthroscopic Partial Meniscectomy for Traumatic Meniscal TearsThe American Journal of Sports Medicine, 2010
- Occupational Kneeling and Meniscal Tears: A Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study in Floor LayersThe Journal of Rheumatology, 2009
- RESULTS OF MENISCECTOMY FOR TREATMENT OF ISOLATED MENISCAL INJURIES. CORRELATION BETWEEN RESULTS AND ETIOLOGY OF INJURYClinics, 2006
- The causes and mechanisms of meniscal injuries in the sporting and non-sporting environment in an unselected populationThe Knee, 2004
- The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS): from joint injury to osteoarthritisHealth and Quality of Life Outcomes, 2003
- Tests of Data Quality, Scaling Assumptions, and Reliability of the Danish SF-36Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1998
- Recovery of Muscle Strength Following Arthroscopic MeniscectomyJournal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, 1996