Design of effective outpatient sentinel surveillance for COVID-19 decision-making: a modeling study
Preprint
Abstract
Background Decision-makers impose COVID-19 mitigations based on public health indicators such as reported cases, which are sensitive to fluctuations in supply and demand for diagnostic testing, and hospital admissions, which lag infections by up to two weeks. Imposing mitigations too early has unnecessary economic costs, while imposing too late leads to uncontrolled epidemics with unnecessary cases and deaths. Sentinel surveillance of recently-symptomatic individuals in outpatient testing sites may overcome biases and lags in conventional indicators, but the minimal outpatient sentinel surveillance system needed for reliable trend estimation remains unknown. Methods We used a stochastic, compartmental transmission model to evaluate the performance of various surveillance indicators at reliably triggering an alarm in response to, but not before, a step increase in transmission of SARS-CoV-2. The surveillance indicators included hospital admissions, hospital occupancy, and sentinel cases with varying levels of sampling effort capturing 5, 10, 20, 50 or 100% of incident mild cases. We tested 3 levels of transmission increase, 3 population sizes, and condition of either simultaneous transmission increase, or lagged increase in older population. We compared the indicators’ performance at triggering alarm soon after, but not prior, to the transmission increase. Results Compared to surveillance based on hospital admissions, outpatient sentinel surveillance that captured at least 20% of incident mild cases could trigger alarm 2 to 5 days earlier for a mild increase in transmission and 6 days earlier for moderate or strong increase. Sentinel surveillance triggered fewer false alarms and averted more deaths per day spent in mitigation. When transmission increase in older populations lagged increase in younger populations by 14 days, sentinel surveillance extended its lead time over hospital admissions by an additional 2 days. Conclusions Sentinel surveillance of mild symptomatic cases can provide more timely and reliable information on changes in transmission to inform decision-makers in an epidemic like COVID-19.Keywords
All Related Versions
- Published version: BMC Infectious Diseases, 23 (1), 1.
This publication has 48 references indexed in Scilit:
- Clinical course and outcomes of critically ill patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a single-centered, retrospective, observational studyThe Lancet Respiratory Medicine, 2020
- An interactive web-based dashboard to track COVID-19 in real timeThe Lancet Infectious Diseases, 2020
- Clinical Characteristics of 138 Hospitalized Patients With 2019 Novel Coronavirus–Infected Pneumonia in Wuhan, ChinaJAMA, 2020
- Nowcasting the Number of New Symptomatic Cases During Infectious Disease Outbreaks Using Constrained P-spline SmoothingEpidemiology, 2019
- A modelling approach for correcting reporting delays in disease surveillance dataStatistics in Medicine, 2019
- Accounting for Healthcare-Seeking Behaviours and Testing Practices in Real-Time Influenza ForecastsTropical Medicine and Infectious Disease, 2019
- Projecting social contact matrices in 152 countries using contact surveys and demographic dataPLOS Computational Biology, 2017
- Bayesian nowcasting during the STEC O104:H4 outbreak in Germany, 2011Biometrics, 2014
- A New Framework and Software to Estimate Time-Varying Reproduction Numbers During EpidemicsAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 2013
- EpiFire: An open source C++ library and application for contact network epidemiologyBMC Bioinformatics, 2012