Role of two‐dimensional strain echocardiographic parameters in suspected acute coronary syndrome patients with initial non‐diagnostic electrocardiogram and troponins: An observational study
- 7 July 2023
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Echocardiography
- Vol. 40 (8) , 802-809
Abstract
Introduction: Diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is often challenging especially in presence of initial normal troponins and non‐specific electrocardiogram. The index study aimed at determining the diagnostic value of strain echocardiography in patients with suspected ACS but with non‐diagnostic electrocardiogram and echocardiography findings.Methods: The study was conducted on 42 patients with suspected ACS and non‐diagnostic electrocardiograms, normal quantitative troponin‐T levels, and left ventricular function. All patients underwent conventional and 2D‐strain echocardiography followed by coronary angiography, within 24 h of admission. Patients with regional wall motion abnormalities (RWMA), valvular heart disease, suspected myocarditis, and past coronary artery disease (CAD) were excluded.Results: Amongst the global strains, the global circumferential strain (GCS) was significantly reduced (p = .014) amongst those with significant CAD on angiography as opposed to global longitudinal strain (GLS) which was similar in the two groups (p = .33). The GCS/GLS ratio was also significantly reduced in patients with significant CAD compared to those with normal/mild disease on coronary angiography (p = .025). Both the parameters had good accuracy in predicting significant CAD. GCS displayed a sensitivity of 80% and a specificity of 86% at an optimal cut‐off 31.5% (AUROC: .93, 95% CI: .601–1.000; p = .03), and likewise GCS/GLS ratio had a sensitivity of 80% and a specificity and 86% at a cut‐off of 1.89% (AUROC: .86, 95% CI: .592–1.000; p = .049). GLS and peak atrial longitudinal strain (PALS) did not differ significantly in patients with/without significant CAD (p = .32 and .58, respectively).Conclusion: GCS and GCS/GLS ratio provides incremental value in comparison to GLS, PALS, and tissue Doppler indices (E/e’) in patients with suspected ACS and non‐diagnostic electrocardiogram and troponins. GCS at cut‐off of >31.5% and GCS/GLS ratio >1.89 can reliably exclude patients with significant CAD in this setting.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin I and Clinical Risk Scores in Patients With Suspected Acute Coronary SyndromeCirculation, 2018
- The Usefulness and Limitations of Point-of-care Cardiac Troponin Measurement in the Emergency DepartmentInternal Medicine, 2018
- Association between layer-specific global longitudinal strain and adverse outcomes following acute coronary syndromeEuropean Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging, 2018
- Normal range of myocardial layer-specific strain using two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiographyPLOS ONE, 2017
- Role of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in acute and chronic ischemic heart diseaseThe International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging, 2017
- Left Ventricular Deformation at Rest Predicts Exercise-Induced Elevation in Pulmonary Artery Wedge Pressure in Patients with Unexplained DyspnoeaEuropean Journal of Heart Failure, 2016
- Usefulness of layer-specific strain for identifying complex CAD and predicting the severity of coronary lesions in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome: Compared with Syntax scoreInternational Journal of Cardiology, 2016
- Two-dimensional strain echocardiography for diagnosing chest pain in the emergency room: a multicentre prospective study by the Israeli echo research groupEuropean Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging, 2016
- Myocardial deformation by strain echocardiography identifies patients with acute coronary syndrome and non-diagnostic ECG presenting in a chest pain unit: a prospective study of diagnostic accuracyClinical Research in Cardiology, 2015
- Definitions for a common standard for 2D speckle tracking echocardiography: consensus document of the EACVI/ASE/Industry Task Force to standardize deformation imagingEuropean Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging, 2014