Keratoconus severity identification using unsupervised machine learning
Open Access
- 6 November 2018
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 13 (11) , e0205998
Abstract
We developed an unsupervised machine learning algorithm and applied it to big corneal parameters to identify and monitor keratoconus stages. A big dataset of corneal swept source optical coherence tomography (OCT) images of 12,242 eyes acquired from SS-1000 CASIA OCT Imaging Systems in multiple centers across Japan was assembled. A total of 3,156 eyes with valid Ectasia Status Index (ESI) between zero and 100% were selected for the downstream analysis. Four hundred and twenty corneal topography, elevation, and pachymetry parameters (excluding ESI Keratoconus indices) were selected. The algorithm included three major steps. 1) Principal component analysis (PCA) was used to linearly reduce the dimensionality of the input data from 420 to eight significant principal components. 2) Manifold learning was used to further reducing the selected principal components nonlinearly to two eigen-parameters. 3) Finally, a density-based clustering was applied to the eigen-parameters to identify eyes with keratoconus. Visualization of clusters in 2-D space was used to validate the quality of learning subjectively and ESI was used to assess the accuracy of the identified clusters objectively. The proposed method identified four clusters; I: a cluster composed of mostly normal eyes (224 eyes with ESI equal to zero, 23 eyes with ESI between five and 29, and nine eyes with ESI greater than 29), II: a cluster composed of mostly healthy eyes and eyes with forme fruste keratoconus (1772 eyes with ESI equal to zero, 698 eyes with ESI between five and 29, and 117 eyes with ESI greater than 29), III: a cluster composed of mostly eyes with mild keratoconus stage (184 eyes with ESI greater than 29, 74 eyes with ESI between five and 29, and 6 eyes with ESI equal to zero), and IV: a cluster composed of eyes with mostly advanced keratoconus stage (80 eyes had ESI greater than 29 and 1 eye had ESI between five and 29). We found that keratoconus status and severity can be well identified using unsupervised machine learning algorithms along with linear and non-linear corneal data transformation. The proposed method can better identify and visualize the keratoconus stages.Keywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Aberrations and Topography in Normal, Keratoconus-Suspect, and Keratoconic EyesOptometry and Vision Science, 2012
- Novel Pachymetric Parameters Based on Corneal Tomography for Diagnosing KeratoconusJournal of Refractive Surgery, 2011
- Topographic and Tomographic Properties of Forme Fruste Keratoconus CorneasInvestigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 2010
- Corneal volume, pachymetry, and correlation of anterior and posterior corneal shape in subclinical and different stages of clinical keratoconusJournal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 2010
- Keratoconus Detection Using Corneal TopographyJournal of Refractive Surgery, 2009
- Keratoconus: Classification scheme based on videokeratography and clinical signsJournal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 2009
- Data clustering as an optimum‐path forest problem with applications in image analysisInternational Journal of Imaging Systems and Technology, 2009
- Sensitivity and Specificity of Posterior Corneal Elevation Measured by Pentacam in Discriminating Keratoconus/Subclinical KeratoconusOphthalmology, 2008
- Corneal-thickness spatial profile and corneal-volume distribution: Tomographic indices to detect keratoconusJournal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 2006
- Changes in anterior and posterior corneal curvatures in keratoconusOphthalmology, 2000