Procedural obedience as a behavioral safety failure: Evidence from a Milgram-paradigm study of agentic LLMs
Authors:
- Hadar DeryHDHadar Dery
- David PitermanDPDavid Piterman
- Elad RefouaERElad Refoua
- Gunther MeinlschmidtGMGunther Meinlschmidt
- Kfir BarKBKfir Bar
- Ziv Ben-ZionZBZiv Ben-Zion
- Zohar ElyosephZEZohar Elyoseph
Open Access
- 19 September 2026
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Computers in Human Behavior Reports
- Vol. 24
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- Execution of harm-enabling actions by LLM agents during simulated psychiatric crisesComputers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans, 2026
- Large language models as mental health resources: Patterns of use in the United States.Practice Innovations, 2026
- Would ChatGPT help me eat my dead dog? probing moral judgment and moral action in large language modelsComputers in Human Behavior Reports, 2026
- Reading between the lines: LLMs match or exceed human empathic accuracy using text aloneComputers in Human Behavior Reports, 2026
- Use of Generative AI for Mental Health Advice Among US Adolescents and Young AdultsJAMA Network Open, 2025
- Why we need mandatory safeguards for emotionally responsive AINature, 2025
- A survey on large language model based autonomous agentsFrontiers of Computer Science, 2024
- Replicating Milgram: Would people still obey today?American Psychologist, 2009
- Administrative Obedience: Carrying Out Orders to use Psychological‐Administrative ViolenceEuropean Journal of Social Psychology, 1986
- Behavioral Study of obedience.The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1963