The new gender essentialism – domestic and family ‘choices’ and their relation to attitudes1
- 25 November 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in The British Journal of Sociology
- Vol. 56 (4) , 601-620
Abstract
This paper critically examines two strands within contemporary gender essentialism – that is, the argument that men and women are fundamentally different and that it is this ‘difference’ that explains the continuing social and material differences between the sexes. The first strand we examine is Hakim's ‘preference theory’, which has argued that persisting sex differences in employment patterns are an outcome of the ‘choices’ made by different ‘types’ of women. We next examine the claims of populist conservative feminism, that has argued that women (and men) in partnerships will be happier if they adopt a gender role traditionalism in the domestic sphere. Our empirical findings suggest that neither of these theoretical explanations are supported by our data, which is derived from the samples of six countries participating in the International Social Survey Programme Family 2002 module.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Public morality versus personal choice: the failure of social attitude surveysThe British Journal of Sociology, 2003
- Constraints and Choices in Mothers' Employment careers: a Consideration of Hakim's Preference TheoryThe British Journal of Sociology, 2003
- Constraints and choices in mothers' employment careers: a consideration of Hakim's Preference TheoryThe British Journal of Sociology, 2003
- The complexity of family policy reform: The case of NorwayEuropean Societies, 2003
- National Context, Individual Characteristics and Attitudes on Mothers' Employment: A Comparative Analysis of Great Britain, Sweden and NorwayActa Sociologica, 2001
- National Context, Individual Characteristics and Attitudes on Mothers' Employment: A Comparative Analysis of Great Britain, Sweden and NorwayActa Sociologica, 2001
- Faces of Inequality: Gender, Class, and Patterns of Inequalities in Different Types of Welfare StatesSocial Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 2000
- How Comparative Is Comparative Research?American Behavioral Scientist, 1998
- Explaining Women's Employment Patterns: 'Orientations to Work' RevisitedThe British Journal of Sociology, 1998
- Domesticity as the Dangerous Supplement of LiberalismJournal of Women's History, 1991