Discrepancies in measuring bladder volumes with bedside ultrasound and bladder scanning in the intensive care unit: A pilot study
Open Access
- 13 November 2017
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of the Intensive Care Society
- Vol. 19 (2) , 122-126
Abstract
Objective: Intensive care unit patients are at risk for catheter-associated urinary tract infection. Earlier removal of catheters may be possible with accurate measurement of bladder volume. The purpose was to compare measured bladder volumes with bedside ultrasound, bladder scanner, and urine volume. Design: Prospective correlational descriptive study. Setting: Surgical/trauma intensive care unit and medical intensive care unit. Patients: Renal dialysis patients with less than 100 ml of urine in 24 h prior to urinary catheter removal and patients with suspected catheter obstruction. Measurements and main results: A physician trained in ultrasound and an advanced practice registered nurse trained in bladder scanning measured bladder volume; each blinded to the other’s measurement. Device used first (ultrasound or bladder scanner) alternated daily. The intensive care unit team determined need for intermittent catheterization or treatment for suspected obstruction. Fifty-one measurements from 13 patients were obtained with results reported in milliliters. Ultrasound measurements were a mean volume of 72.1 ± 127 (range: 1.7–666) and the bladder scanner measurements were 117 ± 131 (0–529). On six occasions in five dialysis patients, urine volume measurement was available. The mean difference in ultrasound–urine volume mean difference was 0.5 ± 37.8 (range: −68 to 38.2) and the bladder scanner–urine volume was 132 ± 167 (−72 to 397). Two patients with suspected catheter obstructions had ultrasound, bladder scanner, urine volume measurements, respectively: (1) 539, 51, >300 (began voiding before catheter replaced); (2) 666, 68, 1000 with catheter replacement. Conditions leading to greatest differences were obesity, indwelling catheter and ascites. Conclusions: These results demonstrate the inaccuracy of the bladder scanner. Ultrasound measurements appear more accurate. To remove urinary catheters in patients with minimal to low urine output, serial ultrasound measurements can be used to monitor bladder volumes and return of renal function.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Program to Prevent Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infection in Acute CareNew England Journal of Medicine, 2016
- Introducing the No Preventable Harms campaign: Creating the safest health care system in the world, starting with catheter-associated urinary tract infection preventionAmerican Journal of Infection Control, 2015
- Regional Variation in Urinary Catheter Use and Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infection: Results from a National CollaborativeInfection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, 2014
- Strategies to Prevent Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections in Acute Care Hospitals: 2014 UpdateInfection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, 2014
- Reducing unnecessary urinary catheter use and other strategies to prevent catheter-associated urinary tract infection: an integrative reviewBMJ Quality & Safety, 2013
- Nurse-directed interventions to reduce catheter-associated urinary tract infectionsAmerican Journal of Infection Control, 2012
- Accuracy of post‐void residual urine volume measurement using a portable ultrasound bladder scanner with real‐time pre‐scan imagingNeurourology and Urodynamics, 2011
- The Effect of the Bladder Scanner Policy on the Number of Urinary Catheters InsertedJournal of Wound, Ostomy & Continence Nursing, 2011
- The effectiveness of the ultrasound bladder scanner in reducing urinary tract infections: a meta‐analysisJournal of Clinical Nursing, 2010
- Accuracy and precision of a new portable ultrasound scanner, the BME-150A, in residual urine volume measurement: a comparison with the BladderScan BVI 3000International Urogynecology Journal, 2006