The Net Promoter Score – an asset to patient experience surveys?
- 27 October 2014
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Health Expectations
- Vol. 18 (6) , 3099-3109
Abstract
Background: In the search for more straightforward ways of summarizing patient experiences and satisfaction, there is growing interest in the Net Promoter Score (NPS): How likely is it that you would recommend our company to a friend or colleague?Objective: To assess what the NPS adds to patient experience surveys. The NPS was tested against three other constructs already used in current surveys to summarize patient experiences and satisfaction: global ratings, recommendation questions and overall scores calculated from patient experiences. To establish whether the NPS is a valid measure for summarizing patient experiences, its association with these experiences should be assessed.Methods: Associations between the NPS and the three other constructs were assessed and their distributions were compared. Also, the association between the NPS and patient experiences was assessed. Data were used from patient surveys of inpatient hospital care (N = 6018) and outpatient hospital care (N = 10 902) in six Dutch hospitals.Results: Analyses showed that the NPS was moderately to strongly correlated with the other three constructs. However, their distributions proved distinctly different. Furthermore, the patient experiences from the surveys showed weaker associations with the NPS than with the global rating and the overall score.Conclusions: Because of the limited extent to which the NPS reflects the survey results, it seems less valid as a summary of patient experiences than a global rating, the existing recommendation question or an overall score calculated from patient experiences. In short, it is still unclear what the NPS specifically adds to patient experience surveys.Keywords
Funding Information
- National Health Care Institute (Kwaliteitsinstituut)
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Overall scores as an alternative to global ratings in patient experience surveys; a comparison of four methodsBMC Health Services Research, 2013
- Can Hospital Cultural Competency Reduce Disparities in Patient Experiences With Care?Medical Care, 2012
- Structure, process or outcome: which contributes most to patients' overall assessment of healthcare quality?BMJ Quality & Safety, 2011
- Do patient experiences on priority aspects of health care predict their global rating of quality of care? A study in five patient groupsHealth Expectations, 2010
- The Dutch Consumer Quality Index: an example of stakeholder involvement in indicator developmentBMC Health Services Research, 2010
- How do healthcare consumers process and evaluate comparative healthcare information? A qualitative study using cognitive interviewsBMC Public Health, 2009
- Dutch healthcare reform: did it result in performance improvement of health plans? A comparison of consumer experiences over timeBMC Health Services Research, 2009
- A Simple and Valuable Approach for Measuring Customer SatisfactionOtolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, 2005
- Psychometric Properties of the Consumer Assessment of Health Plans Study (CAHPS®) 2.0 Adult Core SurveyHealth Services Research, 2003
- Supporting Informed Consumer Health Care Decisions: Data Presentation Approaches that Facilitate the Use of Information in ChoiceAnnual Review of Public Health, 2003