A cross-validation trial of an Internet-based prevention program for alcohol and cannabis: Preliminary results from a cluster randomised controlled trial
Open Access
- 23 March 2015
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry
- Vol. 50 (1) , 64-73
Abstract
Objective: Replication is an important step in evaluating evidence-based preventive interventions and is crucial for establishing the generalizability and wider impact of a program. Despite this, few replications have occurred in the prevention science field. This study aims to fill this gap by conducting a cross-validation trial of the Climate Schools: Alcohol and Cannabis course, an Internet-based prevention program, among a new cohort of Australian students. Method: A cluster randomized controlled trial was conducted among 1103 students ( M age : 13.25 years) from 13 schools in Australia in 2012. Six schools received the Climate Schools course and 7 schools were randomized to a control group (health education as usual). All students completed a self-report survey at baseline and immediately post-intervention. Mixed-effects regressions were conducted for all outcome variables. Outcomes assessed included alcohol and cannabis use, knowledge and intentions to use these substances. Results: Compared to the control group, immediately post-intervention the intervention group reported significantly greater alcohol ( d = 0.67) and cannabis knowledge ( d = 0.72), were less likely to have consumed any alcohol (even a sip or taste) in the past 6 months (odds ratio = 0.69) and were less likely to intend on using alcohol in the future (odds ratio = 0.62). However, there were no effects for binge drinking, cannabis use or intentions to use cannabis. Conclusion: These preliminary results provide some support for the Internet-based Climate Schools: Alcohol and Cannabis course as a feasible way of delivering alcohol and cannabis prevention. Intervention effects for alcohol and cannabis knowledge were consistent with results from the original trial; however, analyses of longer-term follow-up data are needed to provide a clearer indication of the efficacy of the intervention, particularly in relation to behavioral changes.Keywords
This publication has 43 references indexed in Scilit:
- Reliability and validity of young adults' anonymous online reports of marijuana use and thoughts about use.Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 2012
- A systematic review of school‐based alcohol and other drug prevention programs facilitated by computers or the InternetDrug and Alcohol Review, 2012
- The CAP study, evaluation of integrated universal and selective prevention strategies for youth alcohol misuse: study protocol of a cluster randomized controlled trialBMC Psychiatry, 2012
- Academic Achievement and Adolescent Drug Use: An Examination of Reciprocal Effects and Correlated Growth TrajectoriesJournal of School Health, 2010
- Obtaining active parental consent for school‐based research: a guide for researchersAustralian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 2009
- The Delivery of Public Health Interventions via the Internet: Actualizing Their PotentialAnnual Review of Public Health, 2009
- Early-onset drug use and risk for drug dependence problemsAddictive Behaviors, 2009
- How much loss to follow-up is acceptable in long-term randomised trials and prospective studies?Archives of Disease in Childhood, 2008
- Implementation Matters: A Review of Research on the Influence of Implementation on Program Outcomes and the Factors Affecting ImplementationAmerican Journal of Community Psychology, 2008
- Implementing the LifeSkills Training drug prevention program: factors related to implementation fidelityImplementation Science, 2008