The reporting of pre-existing maternal medical conditions and complications of pregnancy on birth certificates and in hospital discharge data
Authors:
- Mona T. Lydon-RochelleMLMona T. Lydon-Rochelle
- Victoria L. HoltVHVictoria L. Holt
- Vicky CárdenasVCVicky Cárdenas
- Jennifer C. NelsonJNJennifer C. Nelson
- Thomas R. EasterlingTEThomas R. Easterling
- Carolyn GardellaCGCarolyn Gardella
- William M. CallaghanWCWilliam M. Callaghan
- 1 July 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Vol. 193 (1) , 125-134
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Factors predictive of failed operative vaginal deliveryAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2004
- International classification of diseases–9th revision coding for preeclampsia: how accurate is it?American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2004
- Elective primary caesarean delivery: accuracy of administrative dataPaediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, 2004
- Association between Gestational Diabetes and Pregnancy-induced HypertensionAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 2003
- Contribution of Excess Weight Gain During Pregnancy and Macrosomia to the Cesarean Delivery Rate, 1990–2000Pediatrics, 2003
- Preeclampsia in the parous woman: Who is at risk?American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2002
- New Jersey's electronic birth certificate program: variations in data sourcesAmerican Journal of Public Health, 2001
- Factors Predicting Cesarean Delivery for American Indian Women in New MexicoBirth, 1999
- How Well Do Birth Certificates Describe the Pregnancies They Report? The Washington State Experience with Low-Risk PregnanciesMaternal and Child Health Journal, 1998
- The quality of the new birth certificate data: a validation study in North Carolina.American Journal of Public Health, 1993