Organic Farming: Biodiversity Impacts Can Depend on Dispersal Characteristics and Landscape Context
Open Access
- 26 August 2015
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 10 (8) , e0135921
Abstract
Organic farming, a low intensity system, may offer benefits for a range of taxa, but what affects the extent of those benefits is imperfectly understood. We explored the effects of organic farming and landscape on the activity density and species density of spiders and carabid beetles, using a large sample of paired organic and conventional farms in the UK. Spider activity density and species density were influenced by both farming system and surrounding landscape. Hunting spiders, which tend to have lower dispersal capabilities, had higher activity density, and more species were captured, on organic compared to conventional farms. There was also evidence for an interaction, as the farming system effect was particularly marked in the cropped area before harvest and was more pronounced in complex landscapes (those with little arable land). There was no evidence for any effect of farming system or landscape on web-building spiders (which include the linyphiids, many of which have high dispersal capabilities). For carabid beetles, the farming system effects were inconsistent. Before harvest, higher activity densities were observed in the crops on organic farms compared with conventional farms. After harvest, no difference was detected in the cropped area, but more carabids were captured on conventional compared to organic boundaries. Carabids were more species-dense in complex landscapes, and farming system did not affect this. There was little evidence that non-cropped habitat differences explained the farming system effects for either spiders or carabid beetles. For spiders, the farming system effects in the cropped area were probably largely attributable to differences in crop management; reduced inputs of pesticides (herbicides and insecticides) and fertilisers are possible influences, and there was some evidence for an effect of non-crop plant species richness on hunting spider activity density. The benefits of organic farming may be greatest for taxa with lower dispersal abilities generally. The evidence for interactions among landscape and farming system in their effects on spiders highlights the importance of developing strategies for managing farmland at the landscape-scale for most effective conservation of biodiversity.Keywords
This publication has 61 references indexed in Scilit:
- Wildlife Ecotoxicology of Pesticides: Can We Track Effects to the Population Level and Beyond?Science, 2013
- Species richness declines and biotic homogenisation have slowed down for NW‐European pollinators and plantsEcology Letters, 2013
- Riparian field margins: can they enhance the functional structure of ground beetle (Coleoptera: Carabidae) assemblages in intensively managed grassland landscapes?Journal of Applied Ecology, 2012
- The impact of agricultural intensification and land-use change on the European arable floraProceedings Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 2011
- Trophic links between functional groups of arable plants and beetles are stable at a national scaleJournal of Animal Ecology, 2011
- Persistent negative effects of pesticides on biodiversity and biological control potential on European farmlandBasic and Applied Ecology, 2010
- On the relationship between farmland biodiversity and land-use intensity in EuropeProceedings Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 2008
- Contrasting responses of arable spiders to the landscape matrix at different spatial scalesJournal of Biogeography, 2007
- Benefits of organic farming to biodiversity vary among taxaBiology Letters, 2005
- Quantifying biodiversity: procedures and pitfalls in the measurement and comparison of species richnessEcology Letters, 2001