Choice experiment, multiple programmes contingent valuation and landscape preferences: How can we support the land use decision making process?
Authors:
- Jeanne Dachary-BernardJDJeanne Dachary-Bernard
- Tina RambonilazaTRTina Rambonilaza
- 1 October 2012
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Land Use Policy
- Vol. 29 (4) , 846-854
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- Reducing gain–loss asymmetry: A virtual reality choice experiment valuing land use changeJournal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2009
- What Have We Learned from Over 20 Years of Farmland Amenity Valuation Research in North America?Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 2009
- Lexicographic Preferences in Discrete Choice Experiments: Consequences on Individual-Specific Willingness to Pay EstimatesSSRN Electronic Journal, 2006
- Effects coding in discrete choice experimentsHealth Economics, 2005
- On visible choice sets and scope sensitivityJournal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2004
- Stated Preference Approaches for Measuring Passive Use Values: Choice Experiments and Contingent ValuationAmerican Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1998
- Is There a Role for Benefit-Cost Analysis in Environmental, Health, and Safety Regulation?Science, 1996
- Combining Revealed and Stated Preference Methods for Valuing Environmental AmenitiesJournal of Environmental Economics and Management, 1994
- Cameron's censored logistic regression model: ReplyJournal of Environmental Economics and Management, 1991
- A new paradigm for valuing non-market goods using referendum data: Maximum likelihood estimation by censored logistic regressionJournal of Environmental Economics and Management, 1988