Pulmonary Specialist Health Coach Consultation model: A randomized controlled trial
Open Access
- 18 May 2026
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Annals of the American Thoracic Society
- Vol. 23 (10) , 1455-1465
Abstract
Rationale: Socioeconomically disadvantaged patients with asthma and/or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) face barriers to evidence-based care that are difficult to overcome in health care settings with limited resources. Objectives: Evaluate the efficacy of a pulmonary-specialist-health coach consultation model (intervention) for patients with asthma and/or COPD, relative to usual care (control). Methods: Randomized-controlled trial of 16 weeks of intervention versus control for adult English- or Spanish-speaking, low-income patients. Intervention: a lay health coach gathered information from the patient and medical record for remote review by a pulmonary specialist, who provided general recommendations to the primary care clinician. The coach supported implementation of recommendations. Measurements: Primary outcomes were receipt of guideline-based care and medications. Secondary outcomes were receipt of chronic lung disease education, breathing-related quality of life and symptoms, patient-rated quality of care, and adherence to inhaler therapy. Longitudinal models for count data were used to estimate Intervention: Control relative rates. Parallel models for continuous data estimated relative means. Main results: 165 intervention participants received 1.61-fold more guideline-based care than 163 control participants (relative ratio; CI: 1.37-1.90). They were not more likely to receive guideline-based medications in planned analysis using a pooled baseline rate, although post-hoc analysis using arm-specific baseline rates found significant improvement. Intervention patients received more chronic lung disease education and reported greater improvements in breathing-related quality of life, symptoms, and patient-reported quality of care. Conclusions: This intervention offers a scalable approach to improve uptake of clinical guidelines in resource-limited primary care practices managing most asthma and COPD care.Keywords
Funding Information
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (1R01HL143366-01A1)
- National Institutes of Health
- National Center for Research Resources
- Colorado Clinical and Translational Science Institute (UL1 RR025780)
- National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
- National Institutes of Health (UL1 TR001872)
- National Institutes of Health
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- Gaps in Care Among Uncontrolled Severe Asthma Patients in the United StatesThe Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice, 2024
- Implementation and Impact of the Pulmonary Specialist Health Coach Consultation Model to Improve Care for Patients with COPDThe Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety, 2021
- National Trends and Disparities in Health Care Access and Coverage Among Adults With Asthma and COPDChest, 2021
- An Update in Health Disparities in COPD in the USACurrent Pulmonology Reports, 2021
- Adherence to COPD management guidelines in general practice? A review of the literatureIrish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -), 2017
- A Randomized Trial of Peer Coach and Office Staff Support to Reduce Coronary Heart Disease Risk in African-Americans with Uncontrolled HypertensionJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2012
- A systematic review of integrated use of disease-management interventions in asthma and COPDRespiratory Medicine, 2009
- COPD: Racial Disparities in Susceptibility, Treatment, and OutcomesClinics in Chest Medicine, 2006
- Physician and patient perceptions in COPD: The COPD Resource Network Needs Assessment SurveyThe American Journal of Medicine, 2005
- Development of the asthma control testJournal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 2004