Analytical Performance of a New Liquid Chromatography/Tandem Mass Spectrometric Method for Determination of Everolimus Concentrations in Whole Blood
Authors:
- Gwendolyn A. McMillinGMGwendolyn A. McMillin
- Kamisha Johnson-DavisKJKamisha Johnson-Davis
- Amitava DasguptaADAmitava Dasgupta
- 1 April 2012
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Therapeutic Drug Monitoring
- Vol. 34 (2) , 222-226
Abstract
The immunosuppressant everolimus was recently approved for prophylactic use in the United States, to prevent organ rejection in adult kidney transplant recipients. The currently accepted therapeutic range for everolimus is 3-8 ng/mL. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) using predose EDTA whole blood samples is required to optimize dose. We describe a simple extraction method and analysis by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) to support routine TDM of everolimus. Samples were prepared by protein precipitation and filtration. The first quadrupole was set to select the ammonium adducts (Equation is included in full-text article.)of everolimus (m/z 975.62) and rapamycin-d3 (m/z 934.70), the internal standard. The second quadrupole was used as a collision chamber, and the third quadrupole was then used to select characteristic product ions of everolimus (m/z 908.50 and 890.50) and rapamycin-d3 (m/z 864.60 and 846.50). The method had an analytical measurement range of 2.0-150 ng/mL. Total imprecision, expressed as percent coefficient of variation (mean concentration), was 19.1% (3.3 ng/mL), 10.6% (5.9 ng/mL), 8.1% (19.2 ng/mL), 5.7% (25.8 ng/mL), and 9.1% (34.2 ng/mL). The new method was compared with 2 other everolimus methods also based on LC-MS/MS, with 64 residual patient specimens. Agreement, based on simple linear regression, was excellent. Method A comparison: y = 0.96x - 1.12 (r = 0.99), n = 20, 2.5-44.7 ng/mL. Method B comparison: y = 0.96x + 0.49 (r = 0.99), n = 44, 2.1-85.6 ng/mL. We conclude that this method could support TDM of everolimus for a wide range of clinical indications.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Rapid estimation of whole blood everolimus concentrations using architect sirolimus immunoassay and mathematical equations: comparison with everolimus values determined by liquid chromatography/mass spectrometryJournal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis, 2011
- Evaluation of QMS Everolimus Assay Using Hitachi 917 Analyzer: Comparison With Liquid Chromatography/Mass SpectrometryTherapeutic Drug Monitoring, 2011
- Comparison of blood sirolimus, tacrolimus and everolimus concentrations measured by LC-MS/MS, HPLC-UV and immunoassay methodsClinical Biochemistry, 2011
- Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry Outperforms Fluorescence Polarization Immunoassay in Monitoring Everolimus Therapy in Renal TransplantationTherapeutic Drug Monitoring, 2010
- Sensitive quantification of sirolimus and everolimus by LC–MS/MS with online sample cleanupJournal of Chromatography B, 2010
- Robust, High-Throughput LC-MS/MS Method for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Cyclosporine, Tacrolimus, Everolimus, and Sirolimus in Whole BloodTherapeutic Drug Monitoring, 2009
- Comparison of the Innofluor® certican assay with HPLC-UV for the determination of everolimus concentrations in heart transplantationClinical Biochemistry, 2006
- Evaluation of a fluorescent polarization immunoassay for whole blood everolimus determination using samples from renal transplant recipientsClinical Biochemistry, 2006
- Clinical Pharmacokinetics of EverolimusClinical Pharmacokinetics, 2004
- SDZ RAD, A NEW RAPAMYCIN DERIVATIVETransplantation, 1997