School socioeconomic-background effects are generally small: a response to Sciffer, Perry, and McConney
Author:
- 18 August 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in British Journal of Sociology of Education
- Vol. 42 (5-6) , 616-626
Abstract
Recently in this journal, Sciffer, Perry, and McConney ( 2020 Sciffer, Michael G. , Laura B. Perry, and Andrew McConney. 2020. “Critiques of Socio-Economic School Compositional Effects: Are They Valid?” British Journal of Sociology of Education 41 (4): 462–475. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2020.1736000. [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar] ) argued that school socioeconomic-background (SES) compositional effects are important for both research and policy. In response, this commentary argues that realistic school SES effects can only be identified in properly specified models. Otherwise, the estimated school effects are very likely to be spurious due to the correlation between school SES and important, but omitted, individual-level influences, most notably prior achievement. In properly specified models with reliable student-level measures, school SES effects are either small or very small. This commentary includes an empirical demonstration of moderate school SES effects becoming small or very small with appropriate controls.Keywords
This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- Is there a school mix effect?Educational Review, 2006
- Is the School Composition Effect Real?: A Discussion With Evidence From the UK PISA DataSchool Effectiveness and School Improvement, 2003
- Statistische Artefakte bei Kontexteffekten in der pädagogisch-psychologischen ForschungZeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 2002
- Time for Self-Criticism: on the Viability of School Effectiveness ResearchSchool Effectiveness and School Improvement, 2001
- Comparison of value‐added models for secondary‐school effectivenessResearch Papers in Education, 1996
- The Estimation of School EffectsJournal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 1995
- Socioeconomic Status and Achievement RevisitedUrban Education, 1993
- Socio‐economic status and educational attainment: A multi‐dimensional and multi‐level studyEvaluation & Research in Education, 1991
- A Longitudinal Hierarchical Linear Model for Estimating School Effects and Their StabilityJournal of Educational Measurement, 1989
- Context and Consex: A Cautionary TaleAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1970