Assessing the causal relationship between income inequality and mortality and self-rated health: protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis
Open Access
- 3 February 2022
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Springer Nature in Systematic Reviews
- Vol. 11 (1) , 1-12
Abstract
Background: Income inequality has been linked to health and mortality. While there has been extensive research exploring the relationship, the evidence for whether the relationship is causal remains disputed. We describe the methods for a systematic review that will transparently assess whether a causal relationship exists between income inequality and mortality and self-rated health. Methods: We will identify relevant studies using search terms relating to income inequality, mortality, and self-rated health (SRH). Four databases will be searched: MEDLINE, ISI Web of Science, EMBASE, and the National Bureau of Economic Research. The inclusion criteria have been developed to identify the study designs best suited to assess causality: multilevel studies that have conditioned upon individual income (or a comparable measure, such as socioeconomic position) and natural experiment studies. Risk of bias assessment of included studies will be conducted using ROBINS-I. Where possible, we will convert all measures of income inequality into Gini coefficients and standardize the effect estimate of income inequality on mortality/SRH. We will conduct random-effects meta-analysis to estimate pooled effect estimates when possible. We will assess causality using modified Bradford Hill viewpoints and assess certainty using GRADE. Discussion: This systematic review protocol lays out the complexity of the relationship between income inequality and individual health, as well as our approach for assessing causality. Understanding whether income inequality impacts the health of individuals within a population has major policy implications. By setting out our methods and approach as transparently as we can, we hope this systematic review can provide clarity to an important topic for public policy and public health, as well as acting as an exemplar for other “causal reviews”.Keywords
Funding Information
- Medical Research Council (MC_UU_00022/2, MC_UU_00022/2, MC_UU_00022/2, MC_UU_00022/2)
- Wellcome Trust (205412/Z/16/Z)
- NHS Research Scotland Senior Clinical Fellowship (SCAF/15/02)
- Chief Scientist Office, Scottish Government Health and Social Care Directorate (SPHSU17, SPHSU17, SPHSU17, SPHSU17)
This publication has 68 references indexed in Scilit:
- Titles versus titles and abstracts for initial screening of articles for systematic reviewsClinical Epidemiology, 2013
- Systematic reviews to evaluate causation: an overview of methods and applicationBMJ Evidence-Based Medicine, 2012
- GRADE guidelines 6. Rating the quality of evidence—imprecisionJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2011
- GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence—inconsistencyJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2011
- GRADE guidelines: 9. Rating up the quality of evidenceJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2011
- Meta-Analysis and Causal Inference: A Case Study of Benzene and Non-Hodgkin LymphomaAnnals of Epidemiology, 2010
- Income Inequality and Socioeconomic Gradients in MortalityAmerican Journal of Public Health, 2008
- Income, Health, and Well-Being around the World: Evidence from the Gallup World PollJournal of Economic Perspectives, 2008
- Income, income inequality and health: what can we learn from aggregate data?Social Science & Medicine, 2002
- Income Inequality and Health: What Does the Literature Tell Us?Annual Review of Public Health, 2000