Impact and trends of intravascular imaging in diagnostic coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention in inpatients in the United States
- 18 July 2018
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
- Vol. 92 (6) , E410-E415
Abstract
Background: Intravascular imaging with intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) is an important adjunct to invasive coronary angiography.Objectives: The primary objective was to examine the frequency of intravascular coronary imaging, trends in imaging use, and outcomes of patients undergoing angiography and/or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the United States.Methods: Adult patients ≥18 years of age undergoing in‐hospital cardiac catheterization from January 2004 to December 2014 were identified from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS). International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD‐9) diagnosis and procedure codes were used to identify IVUS and OCT use during diagnostic angiography and PCI.Results: Among 3,211,872 hospitalizations with coronary angiography, intracoronary imaging was performed in 88,775 cases (4.8% of PCI and 1.0% of diagnostic procedures), with IVUS in 98.9% and OCT in 1.1% of cases. Among patients undergoing PCI, the rate of intravascular coronary imaging increased from 2.1% in 2004–2005 to 6.6% in 2013–2014 (P < 0.001 for trend). Use of intravascular coronary imaging was associated with lower in‐hospital mortality in patients undergoing PCI (adjusted OR 0.77; 95% CI 0.71–0.83). There was marked variability in intravascular imaging by hospital, with 63% and 13% of facilities using intravascular imaging in 15% of PCIs, respectively.Conclusions: In a large administrative database from the United States, intravascular imaging use was low, increased over time, and imaging was associated with reduced in‐hospital mortality. Substantial variation in the frequency of intravascular imaging by hospital was observed. Additional investigation to determine clinical benefits of IVUS and OCT are warranted.Keywords
Funding Information
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (T32HL098129)
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Rate of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for the Management of Acute Coronary Syndromes and Stable Coronary Artery Disease in the United States (2007 to 2011)The American Journal of Cardiology, 2014
- Long-term Survival in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Interventions With or Without Intracoronary Pressure Wire Guidance or Intracoronary Ultrasonographic ImagingJAMA Internal Medicine, 2014
- Clinical Utility of Intravascular Imaging and Physiology in Coronary Artery DiseaseJACC, 2014
- Relationship Between Intravascular Ultrasound Guidance and Clinical Outcomes After Drug-Eluting StentsCirculation, 2014
- Randomized Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Between Intravascular Ultrasound and Angiography-Guided Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation for Long Coronary Artery StenosesJACC: Cardiovascular Interventions, 2013
- Contemporary Patterns of Fractional Flow Reserve and Intravascular Ultrasound Use Among Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in the United StatesJACC, 2012
- Consensus Standards for Acquisition, Measurement, and Reporting of Intravascular Optical Coherence Tomography StudiesJACC, 2012
- Meta-Analysis of Randomized Studies Comparing Intravascular Ultrasound Versus Angiographic Guidance of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Pre–Drug-Eluting Stent EraThe American Journal of Cardiology, 2011
- Comparison of early outcome of percutaneous coronary intervention for unprotected left main coronary artery disease in the drug-eluting stent era with versus without intravascular ultrasonic guidanceThe American Journal of Cardiology, 2005
- American College of Cardiology clinical expert consensus document on standards for acquisition, measurement and reporting of intravascular ultrasound studies (ivus)31When citing this document, the American College of Cardiology would appreciate the following citation format: Mintz GS, Nissen SE, Anderson WD, Bailey SR, Erbel R, Fitzgerald PJ, Pinto FJ, Rosenfield K, Siegel RJ, Tuzcu EM, Yock PG. ACC Clinical Expert Consensus Document on Standards for the acquisition, measurement and reporting of intravascular ultrasound studies: a report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents (Committee to Develop a Clinical Expert Consensus Document on Standards for Acquisition, Measurement and Reporting of Intravascular Ultrasound Studies [IVUS]). J Am Coll Cardiol2001;37:1478–92.33Address for reprints: This document is available on the ACC Website at www.acc.org. Reprints of this document are available for $5.00 each by calling 800-253-4636 (U.S. only) or writing to the Resource Center, American College of Cardiology, Educational Services, 9111 Old Georgetown Road, Bethesda, MD 20814-1699.JACC, 2001