Observer-Blind Randomized Control Trial for the Effectiveness of Intensive Case Management in Seoul: Clinical and Quality-of-Life Outcomes for Severe Mental Illness
Authors:
- Hye-Young MinHMHye-Young Min
- Seung-Hee AhnSASeung-Hee Ahn
- Jeung Suk LimJLJeung Suk Lim
- Hwa Yeon SeoHSHwa Yeon Seo
- Sung Joon ChoSCSung Joon Cho
- Seung Yeon LeeSLSeung Yeon Lee
- Dohhee KimDKDohhee Kim
- Kihoon YouKYKihoon You
- Hyun Seo ChoiHCHyun Seo Choi
- Su-Jin YangSYSu-Jin Yang
- Jee Eun ParkJPJee Eun Park
- Bong Jin HahmBHBong Jin Hahm
Open Access
- 25 May 2025
- journal article
- Published by Korean Neuropsychiatric Association in Psychiatry Investigation
- Vol. 22 (5) , 513-521
Abstract
Objective In South Korea, there is a significant gap in systematic, evidence-based research on intensive case management (ICM) for individuals with severe mental illness (SMI). This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of ICM through a randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing ICM with standard case management (non-ICM).Methods An RCT was conducted to assess the effectiveness of Seoul-intensive case management (S-ICM) vs. non-ICM in individuals with SMI in Seoul. A total of 78 participants were randomly assigned to either the S-ICM group (n=41) or the control group (n=37). Various clinical assessments, including the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), Montgomery–Åsberg Depression Rating Scale, Health of the Nation Outcome Scale, and Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I), along with quality-of-life measures such as the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule, WHO Quality of Life scale, and Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS) were evaluated over a 3-month period. Statistical analyses, including analysis of covariance and logistic regression, were used to determine the effectiveness of S-ICM.Results The S-ICM group had significantly lower odds of self-harm or suicidal attempts compared to the control group (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]=0.30, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.21–1.38). Psychiatric symptoms measured by the BPRS and perceived social support measured by the MSPSS significantly improved in the S-ICM group. The S-ICM group also had significantly higher odds of CGI-I compared to the control group (aOR=8.20, 95% CI: 2.66–25.32).Conclusion This study provides inaugural evidence on the effectiveness of S-ICM services, supporting their standardization and potential nationwide expansion.Keywords
Funding Information
- National Center for Mental Health Research and Development Project (MHIR22B03)
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Study on Effects of an Assertive Community Treatment in a Community Mental Health CenterJournal of Korean Academy of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 2012
- Intensive Case Management for severe mental illness2009
- Systematic assessments of need and care planning in severe mental illnessThe British Journal of Psychiatry, 2004
- Case management for people with severe mental disorders1998
- Health of the Nation Outcome Scales (HoNOS)The British Journal of Psychiatry, 1998
- Models of Community Care for Severe Mental Illness: A Review of Research on Case ManagementSchizophrenia Bulletin, 1998
- Assertive community treatment for frequent users of psychiatric hospitals in a large city: A controlled studyAmerican Journal of Community Psychology, 1990
- The Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social SupportJournal of Personality Assessment, 1988
- A New Depression Scale Designed to be Sensitive to ChangeThe British Journal of Psychiatry, 1979
- The Brief Psychiatric Rating ScalePsychological Reports, 1962