Comparing Methods for Creating a National Random Sample of Twitter Users
Authors:
- Meysam AlizadehMAMeysam Alizadeh
- Mohammadhadi AliahmadiMAMohammadhadi Aliahmadi
- Sarvenaz EbrahimiSESarvenaz Ebrahimi
Preprint
Abstract
Twitter data has been widely used by researchers across various social and computer science disciplines. A common aim when working with Twitter data is the construction of a random sample of users from a given country. However, while several methods have been proposed in the literature, their comparative performance is mostly unexplored. In this paper, we implement four common methods to collect a random sample of Twitter users in the US: 1% Stream, Bounding Box, Location Query, and Language Query. Then, we compare the methods according to their tweet- and user-level metrics as well as their accuracy in estimating US population with and without using inclusion probabilities of various demographics. Our results show that the 1% Stream method performs differently than others in tweet- and user-level metrics, and best for the construction of a population representative sample. We discuss the conditions under which the 1% Stream method may not be suitable and suggest the Bounding Box method as the second-best method to use.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Account credibility inference based on news-sharing networksEPJ Data Science, 2024
- Botometer 101: social bot practicum for computational social scientistsJournal of Computational Social Science, 2022
- Political Knowledge and Misinformation in the Era of Social Media: Evidence From the 2015 UK ElectionBritish Journal of Political Science, 2020
- Content-based features predict social media influence operationsScience Advances, 2020
- Representing the Twittersphere: Archiving a representative sample of Twitter data under resource constraintsInternational Journal of Information Management, 2019
- Psychology and morality of political extremists: evidence from Twitter language analysis of alt-right and AntifaEPJ Data Science, 2019
- Who Leads? Who Follows? Measuring Issue Attention and Agenda Setting by Legislators and the Mass Public Using Social Media DataAmerican Political Science Review, 2019
- Computer‐Assisted Keyword and Document Set Discovery from Unstructured TextAmerican Journal of Political Science, 2017
- Forecasting elections with non-representative pollsInternational Journal of Forecasting, 2015
- Assessing the bias in samples of large online networksSocial Networks, 2014