Clinically impactful differences in variant interpretation between clinicians and testing laboratories: a single-center experience
Open Access
- 1 March 2018
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Genetics in Medicine
- Vol. 20 (3) , 369-373
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Taming the genome: towards better genetic test interpretationGenome Medicine, 2016
- Performance of ACMG-AMP Variant-Interpretation Guidelines among Nine Laboratories in the Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research ConsortiumThe American Journal of Human Genetics, 2016
- ClinGen — The Clinical Genome ResourceNew England Journal of Medicine, 2015
- Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular PathologyGenetics in Medicine, 2015
- Conveying a probabilistic genetic test result to families with an inherited heart diseaseHeart Rhythm, 2014
- Determining pathogenicity of genetic variants in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: importance of periodic reassessmentGenetics in Medicine, 2014
- New population-based exome data are questioning the pathogenicity of previously cardiomyopathy-associated genetic variantsEuropean Journal of Human Genetics, 2013
- HRS/EHRA Expert Consensus Statement on the State of Genetic Testing for the Channelopathies and CardiomyopathiesHeart Rhythm, 2011
- Genetic Evaluation of Cardiomyopathy—A Heart Failure Society of America Practice GuidelineJournal of Cardiac Failure, 2009
- Mandatory Second Opinion in Surgical Pathology Referral Material: Clinical Consequences of Major DisagreementsAmerican Journal of Surgical Pathology, 2008