Real-World Efficacy and Safety of the Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator: Insights from the GASP Registry
Authors:
- Nikias MilarasNikias Milaras
- Evangelos OikonomouEvangelos Oikonomou
- Konstantinos P. LetsasKonstantinos P. Letsas
- Nikolaos KtenopoulosNikolaos Ktenopoulos
- Sotirios XydonasSotirios Xydonas
- Panagiotis KorantzopoulosPanagiotis Korantzopoulos
- Georgios LeventopoulosGeorgios Leventopoulos
- Panagiotis DourvasPanagiotis Dourvas
- Stefanos ArchontakisStefanos Archontakis
- Athena BatsouliAthena Batsouli
- Panagiotis MililisPanagiotis Mililis
- Athanasios SaplaourasAthanasios Saplaouras
Open Access
- 20 June 2025
- journal article
- research article
- Published by MDPI AG in Biomedicines
- Vol. 13 (7) , 1510
Abstract
Background: The advent of subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillators (S-ICDs) marked a significant milestone in the course of cardiac rhythm devices, particularly for patients who are deemed at high risk for ventricular arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death. This extracardiac approach makes the S-ICD an especially valuable option for young patients, those with difficult venous access, or those at high risk of infection. Although the S-ICD does not provide pacing for bradycardia or heart failure, it has shown efficacy in treating ventricular arrhythmias while minimizing complications associated with transvenous systems. Methods: The purpose of this multicenter retrospective analysis was to assess the real-world efficacy and safety of the S-ICD in a heterogeneous population. Results: The GASP registry consisted of 114 patients, 68% male, aged 41 ± 15 years, with a mean LVEF of 50%. In the follow-up of 35 months, inappropriate shocks occurred in 7% while appropriate shocks occurred in 6.2%. The most common reasons for inappropriate shocks were myopotentials and atrial tachyarrhythmias. Thirty-day complication-free rates were 97.3%, with the majority of patients requiring device extraction due to infection. Over the longer term, four patients required re-intervention due to local discomfort, while one device was extracted for infection. In a multivariate analysis, complications were not significantly higher in the sicker population, such as those with diabetes, kidney disease requiring dialysis, or heart failure. Conclusions: These findings support the growing role of the S-ICD as an alternative to the TV-ICD, especially in patients without pacing indications.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- LB-456087-1 FIRST RESULTS OF THE RANDOMIZED PRAETORIAN-DFT TRIAL: PROSPECTIVE VALIDATION OF THE PRAETORIAN SCORE FOR PREDICTION OF DEFIBRILLATION TEST SUCCESS AFTER SUBCUTANEOUS ICD IMPLANTHeart Rhythm, 2023
- Brugada syndrome: Eligibility for subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator after exercise stress testRevista Portuguesa de Cardiologia, 2021
- A novel tool to evaluate the implant position and predict defibrillation success of the subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator: The PRAETORIAN scoreHeart Rhythm, 2019
- Subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator Post-Approval Study: Clinical characteristics and perioperative resultsHeart Rhythm, 2017
- The subcutaneous ICD as an alternative to the conventional ICD system: Initial experience in Greece and a review of the literatureHellenic Journal of Cardiology, 2017
- Long-time “real-life” performance of the subcutaneous ICD in patients with electrical heart disease or idiopathic ventricular fibrillationJournal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, 2016
- Prevalence of subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator candidacy based on template ECG screening in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathyHeart Rhythm, 2016
- Inappropriate shocks in the subcutaneous ICD: Incidence, predictors and managementInternational Journal of Cardiology, 2015
- Safety and Efficacy of the Totally Subcutaneous Implantable DefibrillatorJACC, 2015
- Inappropriate Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator ShocksJACC, 2011