Sandwich Vertebral Fracture in the Study of Adjacent-level Fracture After Vertebral Cement Augmentation
Authors:
- Huilin YangHYHuilin Yang
- Yuanxin ShiYSYuanxin Shi
- Zongping LuoZLZongping Luo
- Weimin JiangWJWeimin Jiang
- Zhaohua BaoZBZhaohua Bao
- Kangwu ChenKCKangwu Chen
- Genlin WangGWGenlin Wang
- 1 August 2012
- journal article
- Published by SLACK, Inc. in Orthopedics
- Vol. 35 (8) , e1225-30
Abstract
The literature is inconclusive on the development of adjacent-level vertebral fracture after initial cement augmentation. A preliminary hypotheses is that cement injection exaggerates force transmission to the adjacent vertebral bodies, thereby predisposing those levels to future fractures. A sandwich vertebra is an intact vertebral body located between 2 previously cemented vertebrae. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the risk of adjacent-level fracture increased due to load shift after a cement injection procedure. The authors retrospectively investigated the rate of adjacent-level fracture after sandwiching compared with conservative treatment and determined the potential causative factors of sandwich vertebral fracture. Age, sex, weight, height, body mass index, follow-up period, and location of sandwich level (T10-L2 or nonT10-L2 junction) were assessed. Surgical variables, including surgical procedure (vertebroplasty or balloon kyphoplasty), surgical approach (through uni- or bilateral pedicle), volume of cement injected into the painful vertebrae, cement leakage into the intervertebral disk, cumulative number of treated levels, and pre- and postoperative kyphotic angulation of the sandwich region, were also analyzed. Nine of 42 sandwiched levels developed fatigue fractures, whereas 11 of 71 patients treated with conservative therapy sustained new vertebral fractures adjacent to the treated levels. Only preoperative kyphotic angulation was the variable positively associated with sandwich vertebral fracture at follow-up ( P =.021). Although subjected to double load shifts, the sandwich vertebra was not prone to structural failure. Thus, cement augmentation protocol does not increase the incidence of adjacent vertebral fracture.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Percutaneous Vertebroplasty for Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures in the NonagenariansSpine, 2011
- Percutaneous Vertebroplasty Is Not a Risk Factor for New Osteoporotic Compression Fractures: Results from VERTOS IIAmerican Journal of Neuroradiology, 2010
- Risk factors of developing new symptomatic vertebral compression fractures after percutaneous vertebroplasty in osteoporotic patientsEuropean Spine Journal, 2006
- Spinal loads after osteoporotic vertebral fractures treated by vertebroplasty or kyphoplastyEuropean Spine Journal, 2005
- Biomechanical changes after the augmentation of experimental osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures in the cadaveric thoracic spineThe Spine Journal, 2005
- Primary and Secondary Osteoporosisʼ Incidence of Subsequent Vertebral Compression Fractures After KyphoplastySpine, 2004
- Osteoporotic Spinal DeformityJournal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques, 2004
- The Effect of Cement Augmentation on the Load Transfer in an Osteoporotic Functional Spinal UnitSpine, 2003
- Material Changes in Osteoporotic Human Cancellous Bone Following Infiltration with Acrylic Bone Cement for a Vertebral Cement AugmentationComputer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, 2003
- Adjacent vertebral failure after vertebroplastyThe Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume, 2002