Which parameterization is suitable for acoustic vertical transverse isotropic full waveform inversion? Part 1: Sensitivity and trade-off analysis
Authors:
- 1 March 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Society of Exploration Geophysicists in Geophysics
- Vol. 78 (2) , R81-R105
Abstract
In most geologic environments, accounting for anisotropy is necessary to perform acoustic full waveform inversion (FWI) of wide-azimuth and wide-aperture seismic data because of the potential dependence of wave speeds on the direction of the wave propagation. In the framework of multiparameter FWI, the subsurface parameterization controls the influence of the different parameter classes on the modeled seismic data as a function of the scattering angle and hence the resolution with which the parameters can be reconstructed and the potential trade-off between different parameters. We have evaluated a numerical procedure based on computation of the scattering patterns of the different parameters to assess the sensitivity of the seismic data to different parameterizations of vertical transverse isotropic media in the acoustic approximation. Among the different categories we have tested, a monoparametric FWI was found for imaging one wave speed with a broad wavenumber content, keeping the Thomsen parameters fixed, which have a small influence on the data relative to the wave speed. This raises the question of the initial information required in the background models of the Thomsen parameters to perform reliable monoparameter FWI. Alternatively, simultaneously inverting the horizontal and vertical wave speeds introduces limited trade-off effects because these wave speeds have significant influence on the data for distinct ranges of scattering angles, while the influence of the Thomsen parameter δ remains weak. With such parameterization, the short-to-intermediate wavelengths of the vertical velocity are updated from the short-to-intermediate scattering angles, while the long-to-intermediate wavelengths of the horizontal velocity are updated from the wide-to-intermediate scattering angles. We concluded that the choice of the subsurface parameterization can be driven by the acquisition geometry, which controls the scattering-angle coverage and hence the resolving power of FWI, and by the accuracy of the available initial FWI models.Keywords
This publication has 38 references indexed in Scilit:
- Full waveform inversion and distance separated simultaneous sweeping: a study with a land seismic data setGeophysical Prospecting, 2012
- Two-dimensional frequency-domain visco-elastic full waveform inversion: Parallel algorithms, optimization and performanceComputers & Geosciences, 2011
- Frequency-Domain Numerical Modelling of Visco-Acoustic Waves Based on Finite-Difference and Finite-Element Discontinuous Galerkin Methods2010
- Thematic Set: Full waveform inversion: the next leap forward in imaging at ValhallFirst Break, 2010
- Feasibility study for an anisotropic full waveform inversion of cross‐well seismic dataGeophysical Prospecting, 2008
- P-wave propagation in transversely isotropic media: I. Finite-frequency theoryPhysics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 2006
- Linearized inverse scattering of teleseismic waves for anisotropic crust and mantle structure: 1. TheoryJournal of Geophysical Research, 2003
- A strategy for nonlinear elastic inversion of seismic reflection dataGeophysics, 1986
- Scattering characteristics of elastic waves by an elastic heterogeneityGeophysics, 1985
- Updating quasi-Newton matrices with limited storageMathematics of Computation, 1980