Cementless revision for infected total hip replacements
Open Access
- 1 January 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery in The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume
- Vol. 93 (1) , 19-26
Abstract
Our aim was to determine the success rate of repeated debridement and two-stage cementless revision arthroplasty according to the type of infected total hip replacement (THR). We enrolled 294 patients (294 hips) with an infected THR in the study. There were 222 men and 72 women with a mean age of 55.1 years (24.0 to 78.0). The rate of control of infection after the initial treatment and after repeated debridement and two-stage revisions was determined. The clinical (Harris hip score) and radiological results were evaluated. The mean follow-up was 10.4 years (5.0 to 14.0). The eventual rate of control of infection was 100.0% for early superficial post-operative infection, 98.4% for early deep post-operative infection, 98.5% for late chronic infection and 91.0% for acute haematogenous infection. Overall, 288 patients (98%) maintained a functioning THR at the latest follow-up. All the allografts appeared to be united and there were no failures. These techniques effectively controlled infection and maintained a functional THR with firm fixation in most patients. Repeated debridement and two-stage or repeated two-stage revisions further improved the rate of control of infection after the initial treatment and increased the likelihood of maintaining a functional THR.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Midterm to Long-term Followup of Staged Reimplantation for Infected Hip ArthroplastyClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2009
- Perioperative Testing for Joint Infection in Patients Undergoing Revision Total Hip ArthroplastyJournal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 2008
- Cementless Two-Stage Exchange Arthroplasty for Infection after Total Hip ArthroplastyThe Journal of Arthroplasty, 2007
- Treatment of acute post-surgical infection of joint arthroplastyClinical Microbiology and Infection, 2006
- Structural allografts for bone stock reconstruction in two-stage revision for infected total hip arthroplasty: Good outcome in 16 of 18 patients followed for 5–14 yearsActa Orthopaedica, 2006
- Cementless Two-staged Total Hip Arthroplasty for Deep Periprosthetic InfectionClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2005
- Revision Hip Arthroplasty Using Strut Allografts and Fully Porous-Coated StemsThe Journal of Arthroplasty, 2005
- Allograft bone in two-stage revision of the hip for infectionThe Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume, 2004
- CEMENTED REVISION OF FAILED UNCEMENTED FEMORAL COMPONENTS OF TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTYJournal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 2003
- Long-Term Results of Cemented Femoral Revision Surgery Using Second-Generation TechniquesClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 1994