Microphysical modeling of cirrus: 1. Comparison with 1986 FIRE IFO measurements
Authors:
- Eric J. JensenEJEric J. Jensen
- Owen B. ToonOTOwen B. Toon
- Douglas L. WestphalDWDouglas L. Westphal
- Stefan KinneSKStefan Kinne
- Andrew J. HeymsfieldAHAndrew J. Heymsfield
- 20 May 1994
- journal article
- Published by American Geophysical Union (AGU) in Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
- Vol. 99 (D5) , 10421-10442
Abstract
We have used a one‐dimensional model of cirrus formation to study the development of cirrus clouds during the 1986 First ISCCP (International Satellite Cloud Climatology Project) Regional Experiment (FIRE) intensive field observations (IFO). The cirrus model includes microphysical, dynamical, and radiative processes. Sulfate aerosols, solution drops, ice crystals, and water vapor are all treated as interactive elements in the model. Ice crystal size distributions are fully resolved based on calculations of homogeneous freezing nucleation, growth by water vapor deposition, evaporation, coagulation, and vertical transport. We have focused on the cirrus observed on November 1, 1986. Vertical wind speed for the one‐dimensional simulation is taken from a mesoscale model simulation for the appropriate time period. The mesoscale model simulation suggested that strong upward motions over Wyoming and subsequent horizontal transport of upper level moisture were responsible for the cirrus observed over Wisconsin on this date. We assumed that our one‐dimensional model could be used to represent a vertical column moving from Wyoming to Wisconsin over a period of several hours. Ice crystal nucleation occurs in our model in the 8 to 10‐km region as a result of the strong updrafts (and cooling) early in the simulation. Growth, coagulation, and sedimentation of these ice crystals result in a broad cloud region (5–10 km thick) with an optical depth of 1–2 after a few hours, in agreement with the FIRE measurements. Comparison with aircraft microphysical measurements made over Wisconsin indicates that the simulation generated reasonable ice water content, but the predicted ice number densities are too low, especially for radii less than about 50 μm. Sensitivity tests suggest that better agreement between simulated and observed microphysical properties is achieved if the nucleation rate is higher or stronger vertical mixing (perhaps associated with multidimensional motions) is present.Keywords
This publication has 43 references indexed in Scilit:
- Microphysical modeling of cirrus: 2. Sensitivity studiesJournal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 1994
- The 27–28 October 1986 FIRE Cirrus Case Study: Meteorology and CloudsMonthly Weather Review, 1990
- Cirrus Crystal Nucleation by Homogeneous Freezing of Solution DropletsJournal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 1989
- Homogeneous Nucleation Rate for Highly Supercooled Cirrus Cloud DropletsJournal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 1988
- Cirrus Clouds. Part I: A Cirrus Cloud ModelJournal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 1985
- Highly Supercooled Cirrus Cloud Water: Confirmation and Climatic ImplicationsScience, 1985
- Homogeneous Condensation—Freezing Nucleation Rate Measurements for Small Water Droplets in an Expansion Cloud ChamberJournal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 1981
- Cloudiness as a Climatic Feedback Mechanism: Effects on Cloud Amounts of Prescribed Global and Regional Surface Temperature Changes in the NCAR GCMJournal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 1978
- The Survival of Ice Particles Falling from Cirrus Clouds in Subsaturated AirJournal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 1976
- THE PRODUCTION OF RAIN BY A CHAIN REACTION IN CUMULUS CLOUDS AT TEMPERATURES ABOVE FREEZINGJournal of Meteorology, 1948