Supporting sensemaking of physics equations: An intervention study in undergraduate courses
Open Access
- 22 May 2026
- journal article
- Published by American Physical Society (APS) in Physical Review Physics Education Research
- Vol. 22 (1)
Abstract
A deep understanding of mathematical equations and their physical meaning is an important skill for physicists and therefore a central learning goal in university physics education. However, many students approach mathematical expressions in physics in a purely procedural manner, using them as calculation tools without critically evaluating their physical plausibility. Making sense of equations, that is, being able to interpret and evaluate equations within a physical context, is essential for the development of expertlike reasoning in physics. Frequently employed strategies that assist in the sensemaking process are dimensional, covariational, special, and limiting case analysis. Despite their importance, these strategies are rarely taught or practiced explicitly in university physics courses. The present intervention study systematically implemented sensemaking strategies within a university course for first-year physics students covering topics of electro- and magnetostatics as well as electrodynamics. Traditional exercises were enriched with tasks requiring students to critically evaluate the plausibility of self-derived equations. The tasks were integrated into recitation sessions and homework assignments. A total of N = 67 physics students participated in the study. A quasiexperimental pre-post design with two groups was employed to evaluate the effectiveness of the intervention approach. Results show that students highly valued all four strategies equally and reported an increased perceived competence in their application after the intervention. Significant improvements in performance were observed for dimensional ( d = 0.67 ) as well as for special case analysis ( d = 0.50 ). Students’ performance in analyzing covariations only showed a tendency favoring the intervention group. No intervention-related impact on the performance of limiting case analysis was found, suggesting that this strategy may require more extensive practice. The findings underscore the importance and usefulness of explicitly teaching strategies to support students’ sensemaking of physics equations.Keywords
Funding Information
- Georg-August-Universität Göttingen
- Wilfried and Ingrid Kuhn Foundation
- Hochschulpakt Lehre
This publication has 38 references indexed in Scilit:
- Defining sensemaking: Bringing clarity to a fragmented theoretical constructScience Education, 2018
- Three concepts or one? Students’ understanding of basic limit conceptsEducational Studies in Mathematics, 2016
- Didaktik der Analysis2016
- Language of Physics, Language of Math: Disciplinary Culture and Dynamic EpistemologyScience & Education, 2015
- Upper-division student understanding of Coulomb’s law: Difficulties with continuous charge distributionsAIP Conference Proceedings, 2013
- Experimentalphysik 22013
- Modelling Mathematical Reasoning in Physics EducationScience & Education, 2011
- How Effective are Instructional Explanations in Example-Based Learning? A Meta-Analytic ReviewEducational Psychology Review, 2010
- Combining effect size estimates in meta-analysis with repeated measures and independent-groups designs.Psychological Methods, 2002
- Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of TestsPsychometrika, 1951