A systematic review comparing the costs of chiropractic care to other interventions for spine pain in the United States
Open Access
- 1 June 2015
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Health Services Research
- Vol. 15 (1) , 1-21
Abstract
Although chiropractors in the United States (US) have long suggested that their approach to managing spine pain is less costly than other health care providers (HCPs), it is unclear if available evidence supports this premise. A systematic review was conducted using a comprehensive search strategy to uncover studies that compared health care costs for patients with any type of spine pain who received chiropractic care or care from other HCPs. Only studies conducted in the US and published in English between 1993 and 2015 were included. Health care costs were summarized for studies examining: 1. private health plans, 2. workers’ compensation (WC) plans, and 3. clinical outcomes. The quality of studies in the latter group was evaluated using a Consensus on Health Economic Criteria (CHEC) list. The search uncovered 1276 citations and 25 eligible studies, including 12 from private health plans, 6 from WC plans, and 7 that examined clinical outcomes. Chiropractic care was most commonly compared to care from a medical physician, with few details about the care received. Heterogeneity was noted among studies in patient selection, definition of spine pain, scope of costs compared, study duration, and methods to estimate costs. Overall, cost comparison studies from private health plans and WC plans reported that health care costs were lower with chiropractic care. In studies that also examined clinical outcomes, there were few differences in efficacy between groups, and health care costs were higher for those receiving chiropractic care. The effects of adjusting for differences in sociodemographic, clinical, or other factors between study groups were unclear. Although cost comparison studies suggest that health care costs were generally lower among patients whose spine pain was managed with chiropractic care, the studies reviewed had many methodological limitations. Better research is needed to determine if these differences in health care costs were attributable to the type of HCP managing their care.Keywords
This publication has 55 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cost-effectiveness of conservative treatments for neck pain: a systematic review on economic evaluationsEuropean Spine Journal, 2012
- Spinal manipulative therapy for chronic low-back painCochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2011
- Cost-effectiveness of guideline-endorsed treatments for low back pain: a systematic reviewEuropean Spine Journal, 2011
- The Chiropractic Hospital-based Interventions Research Outcomes (CHIRO) Study: a randomized controlled trial on the effectiveness of clinical practice guidelines in the medical and chiropractic management of patients with acute mechanical low back painThe Spine Journal, 2010
- 2009 Updated Method Guidelines for Systematic Reviews in the Cochrane Back Review GroupSpine, 2009
- Determinants of Costs and Pain Improvement for Medical and Chiropractic Care of Low Back PainJournal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics, 2009
- Colorado workers' compensation: medical vs chiropractic costs for the treatment of low back painJournal of Chiropractic Medicine, 2008
- A Randomized Trial of Medical Care With and Without Physical Therapy and Chiropractic Care With and Without Physical Modalities for Patients With Low Back Pain: 6-Month Follow-Up Outcomes From the UCLA Low Back Pain StudySpine, 2002
- Chiropractic and Medical Costs of Low Back CareMedical Care, 1996
- Some Interim Results from a Controlled Trial of Cost Sharing in Health InsuranceNew England Journal of Medicine, 1981