INSTITUTIONAL SOURCES OF INTELLECTUAL POVERTY IN COMMUNICATION RESEARCH
Author:
- 1 October 1986
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Communication Research
- Vol. 13 (4) , 527-559
Abstract
Why has the field of communication failed to define itself, its intellectual focus, and its mission in a coherent way? This essay explores reasons for this failure, focusing especially on the institutional use of the field's central terms and concepts. Incoherence has been the price of institutional success. What defines communication's unique identity as a field is also what maintains its conceptual confusions. The field is compared to a nation-state. The essay places the field's emergence in the context of the history of the social sciences in order to help illuminate its current crises and to explore how we might find new ways of conceiving the field's intellectual task.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- SOURCE, DESTINATION, AND ENTROPYCommunication Research, 1984
- The Trouble with U.S. Communication ResearchJournal of Communication, 1983
- The Unique Perspective of Communication: A Retrospective ViewJournal of Communication, 1983
- Emancipation or Domestication: Toward a Utopian Science of CommunicationJournal of Communication, 1983
- Taking Stock of a DisciplineJournal of Communication, 1983
- "TIS THE SEASON TO BE JOLLY": A YULETIDE 1980 ASSESSMENT OF COMMUNICATION RESEARCHHuman Communication Research, 1981
- The beginning of modern mass communication researchEuropean Journal of Sociology, 1978
- The State of Communication Research: CommentPublic Opinion Quarterly, 1959
- The State of Communication ResearchPublic Opinion Quarterly, 1959
- Social Engineers as Saviors: Effects of World War I on Some American LiberalsJournal of the History of Ideas, 1956