The construction of the public in letters to the editor
- 1 August 2002
- journal article
- other
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journalism
- Vol. 3 (2) , 183-204
Abstract
Drawing on an ethnographic study, this article describes how the editorial-page staff at one San Francisco Bay newspaper think of the letter-writing public. It is suggested that the staff are skeptical about the value of the letters section as a site for democratic communication because of what they perceive as the poor quality of public participation, as well as the non-representativeness of the letter-writers. To be more specific, the editors speak the ‘idiom of insanity’, which plays off the idea that contributors to the section – the members of the letter-writing public – are insane or ‘crazy’. This article examines the manifestations of the idiom of insanity and analyses its implications for deliberative democracy; it also suggests that the use of the idiom of insanity is a way for the staff to distance themselves from their work on letters to the editor, and renounce their responsibility to make democracy work.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Politics of Public JournalismJournalism Studies, 2000
- Daily newspaper editors' audience construction routines: A case studyCritical Studies in Media Communication, 2000
- Avoiding Politics1998
- Editors at Most U.S. Dailies See Vital Roles for Editorial PageJournalism Quarterly, 1994
- Political culture and the presentation of a political selfTheory and Society, 1990
- Bias in Selection of Letters to EditorJournalism Quarterly, 1979
- Letters to the Editor of the Non-Daily PressJournalism Quarterly, 1979
- How Public Perceives Letters to the EditorJournalism Quarterly, 1976
- Objectivity as Strategic Ritual: An Examination of Newsmen's Notions of ObjectivityAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1972
- Letters to the Editor: Hazy Reflections of Public OpinionJournalism Quarterly, 1970