Sustained inflation and chest compression versus 3:1 chest compression to ventilation ratio during cardiopulmonary resuscitation of asphyxiated newborns (SURV1VE): A cluster randomised controlled trial
Open Access
- 11 January 2024
- journal article
- research article
- Published by BMJ in Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition
- Vol. 109 (4) , 428-435
Abstract
Objective In newborn infants requiring chest compression (CC) in the delivery room (DR) does continuous CC superimposed by a sustained inflation (CC+SI) compared with a 3:1 compression:ventilation (3:1 C:V) ratio decreases time to return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). Design International, multicenter, prospective, cluster cross-over randomised trial. Setting DR in four hospitals in Canada and Austria, Participants Newborn infants >28 weeks’ gestation who required CC. Interventions Hospitals were randomised to CC+SI or 3:1 C:V then crossed over to the other intervention. Main outcome measure The primary outcome was time to ROSC, defined as the duration of CC until an increase in heart rate >60/min determined by auscultation of the heart, which was maintained for 60 s. Sample size of 218 infants (109/group) was sufficient to detect a clinically important 33% reduction (282 vs 420 s of CC) in time to ROSC. Analysis was intention-to-treat. Results Patient recruitment occurred between 19 October 2017 and 22 September 2022 and randomised 27 infants (CC+SI (n=12), 3:1 C:V (n=15), two (one per group) declined consent). All 11 infants in the CC+SI group and 12/14 infants in the 3:1 C:V group achieved ROSC in the DR. The median (IQR) time to ROSC was 90 (60–270) s and 615 (174–780) s (p=0.0502 (log rank), p=0.16 (cox proportional hazards regression)) with CC+SI and 3:1 C:V, respectively. Mortality was 2/11 (18.2%) with CC+SI versus 8/14 (57.1%) with 3:1 C:V (p=0.10 (Fisher’s exact test), OR (95% CI) 0.17; (0.03 to 1.07)). The trial was stopped due to issues with ethics approval and securing trial insurance as well as funding reasons. Conclusion The time to ROSC and mortality was not statistical different between CC+SI and 3:1 C:V. Trial registration NCT02858583.Keywords
Funding Information
- Institute of Circulatory and Respiratory Health (ECIACRR 155222)
- Thrasher Research Fund
This publication has 35 references indexed in Scilit:
- 3:1 Compression to ventilation ratio versus continuous chest compression with asynchronous ventilation in a porcine model of neonatal resuscitationResuscitation, 2014
- Consort 2010 statement: extension to cluster randomised trialsBMJ, 2012
- An Initial Sustained Inflation Improves the Respiratory and Cardiovascular Transition at Birth in Preterm LambsPediatric Research, 2011
- Return of spontaneous circulation with a compression:ventilation ratio of 15:2 versus 3:1 in newborn pigs with cardiac arrest due to asphyxiaArchives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition, 2011
- Extended series of cardiac compressions during CPR in a swine model of perinatal asphyxiaResuscitation, 2010
- Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics supportJournal of Biomedical Informatics, 2009
- Use and Efficacy of Endotracheal Versus Intravenous Epinephrine During Neonatal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in the Delivery RoomPediatrics, 2006
- Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation by Chest Compression Alone or with Mouth-to-Mouth VentilationNew England Journal of Medicine, 2000
- Augmentation of carotid flow during cardiopulmonary resuscitation by ventilation at high airway pressure simultaneous with chest compressionThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1981
- Mechanisms of blood flow during cardiopulmonary resuscitation.Circulation, 1980