Increased Sensitivity in Diagnosis of Tuberculosis in HIV-Positive Patients through the Small-Membrane-Filter Method of Microscopy
- 1 September 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Society for Microbiology in Journal of Clinical Microbiology
- Vol. 51 (9) , 2921-2925
Abstract
The sensitivity of microscopy for the diagnosis of tuberculosis (TB) is around 50% but decreases by about 15% in patients with suspected TB who are coinfected with HIV. Here, we compared the accuracies of three microscopy methods for processing sputum smears (concentration by centrifugation with or without N -acetyl- l -cysteine [NALC] and concentration by filtration on a polycarbonate membrane) to that of culture on Ogawa-Kudoh medium as the gold standard method. Sputum samples were obtained from 432 patients with suspected pulmonary TB, of whom 60% were infected with HIV. Analysis was performed using the first specimen. Compared to the gold standard culture, the small-membrane-filter (SMF) method was the most sensitive microscopic method. In HIV-infected TB patients, the sensitivity of the SMF method was significantly higher than those for centrifugation of sputum samples with or without NALC treatment (61.9%, 47.6%, and 45.2%, respectively; P = 0.001). Similarly, in TB patients without HIV infection, the sensitivity of the SMF method was significantly higher than those for centrifugation of sputum samples with or without NALC treatment (81.8%, 63.6%, and 57.5%, respectively; P = 0.001). In the two study groups, TB patients with or without HIV, no significant differences between the specificities of the three methods were observed. Handling of the second sputum sample similarly by centrifugation with or without NALC and by the SMF method increased positivities by 13%, 11%, and 4%, respectively. The overall agreement between microscopy and culture was above 90% for all groups. Microscopic evaluation of the sputum samples treated with NALC compared to those not treated with NALC did not show any increase in sensitivity. Altogether, the sensitivity of the SMF method is higher than those of the other two microscopic methods studied without a loss of specificity.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Small Membrane Filter Method of Microscopy to Diagnose Pulmonary TuberculosisJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2012
- Evaluation of Processing Methods To Equitably Aliquot Sputa for Mycobacterial TestingJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2012
- Tuberculosis in Antiretroviral Treatment Services in Resource-Limited Settings: Addressing the Challenges of Screening and DiagnosisThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2011
- Clinical management of tuberculosis and HIV-1 co-infectionEuropean Respiratory Journal, 2010
- Clinical and Radiographic Factors Do Not Accurately Diagnose Smear-Negative Tuberculosis in HIV-infected Inpatients in Uganda: A Cross-Sectional StudyPLOS ONE, 2010
- Sensitivity of direct versus concentrated sputum smear microscopy in HIV-infected patients suspected of having pulmonary tuberculosisBMC Infectious Diseases, 2009
- Sputum microscopy for the diagnosis of HIV-associated pulmonary tuberculosis in TanzaniaBMC Public Health, 2008
- Facing the Crisis: Improving the Diagnosis of Tuberculosis in the HIV EraThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2007
- Diagnosis of smear-negative pulmonary tuberculosis in people with HIV infection or AIDS in resource-constrained settings: informing urgent policy changesThe Lancet, 2007
- Clinical evaluation of the Mycobacteria Growth Indicator Tube (MGIT) compared with radiometric (Bactec) and solid media for isolation of Mycobacterium speciesJournal of Medical Microbiology, 1998