Extraction and aggregation in the repair of individual and collective self-reference
Authors:
- 1 August 2007
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Discourse Studies
- Vol. 9 (4) , 526-557
Abstract
On some occasions of self-reference there can be two equally viable forms available to speakers: individual self-reference (e.g. `I') and collective self-reference (e.g. `we'). This means that selection of one or the other in talk-in-interaction can — akin to the selection of terms for reference to non-present persons — be guided by such considerations as recipient design and action formation. As a strategy for investigating the selection of self-reference terms, this article examines repairs to self-reference that change the form of reference from individual to collective and vice versa. We first identify two repair operations found in the domain of self-reference: aggregation (of an individual to a collectivity) and extraction (of an individual from a collectivity) and then we track the use of both operations across a range of positions in the repair initiation opportunity space (and as embedded correction). Finally we consider some of the interactional uses of aggregation and extraction repairs in resolving (and thereby exhibiting) sources of troubles associated with speaker epistemic authority and responsibility for described actions.Keywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Conveying who you are: the presentation of self, strictly speaking2007
- Meanings of the unmarked: how ‘default’ person reference does more than just refer2007
- Alternative recognitionals in person reference2007
- English zero anaphora as an interactional resource IIDiscourse Studies, 2006
- Surprise As an Interactional Achievement: Reaction Tokens in ConversationSocial Psychology Quarterly, 2006
- Who are we and who are you? The strategic use of forms of address in political interviewsText & Talk, 2006
- Heteronormativity in Action: Reproducing the Heterosexual Nuclear Family in After-hours Medical CallsSocial Problems, 2005
- Grammar and Social Organization: Yes/No Interrogatives and the Structure of RespondingAmerican Sociological Review, 2003
- On the “semi-permeable” character of grammatical units in conversation: conditional entry into the turn space of another speaker1996
- Error correction as an interactional resourceLanguage in Society, 1974