What's in a scent? Meaning, shape, and sensorial concepts elicited by scents
- 10 April 2017
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Sensory Studies
- Vol. 32 (2)
Abstract
When selecting an ambient scent to be diffused in a store, one can focus on pleasantness of the scent, congruency of the scent with product category, or a variety of concepts that can be the basis for congruency between scent and other atmospheric elements. However, more information is needed concerning the concepts from which congruency could be sought. This paper studies the strength and direction of 19 bipolar concepts related to meaning, perceived shape and sensory attributes elicited by 32 scents. Factor analysis indicates that the concepts can be grouped into four factors: an angelic, an energetic, a shape, and a depth factor. Cluster analysis indicates that the 32 scents can be grouped based on differences in strength as well as direction of the elicitations. The results indicate that certain concepts do co‐occur and that a classification of scents based on their similar elicitations of concepts might be of value.Practical applications: The results illustrate that the current classification of scents in terms of notes (e.g., floral, fresh, woody, herbal) does not imply that scents present in the same category of notes elicit the same concepts. A new classification based on the elicited concepts is thus advised since this classification will better answer the needs of retailers when choosing a correct ambient scent. In particular, a retailer will then be able to choose the scent that will elicit the concepts he or she wishes to communicate. The results of this study provide a first insight into which concepts and factors need to be measured and which clusters of scents can be expected to arise.Keywords
Funding Information
- Research Foundation - Flanders, (1119717N FWO)
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Assessing the shapes and speech sounds that people associate with chocolate samples varying in cocoa contentFood Quality and Preference, 2011
- On the taste of “Bouba” and “Kiki”: An exploration of word–food associations in neurologically normal participantsCognitive Neuroscience, 2011
- Crossmodal correspondences: A tutorial reviewAttention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 2011
- Cross-modal integration between odors and abstract symbolsNeuroscience Letters, 2010
- Humans Prefer Curved Visual ObjectsPsychological Science, 2006
- Congruency of scent and music as a driver of in-store evaluations and behaviorJournal of Retailing, 2001
- Auditory Pitch as a Perceptual Analogue to Odor QualityPsychological Science, 1997
- Improving the Store Environment: Do Olfactory Cues Affect Evaluations and Behaviors?Journal of Marketing, 1996
- Olfaction as a cue for product qualityMarketing Letters, 1992
- An Index of Factorial SimplicityPsychometrika, 1974