Developing well-calibrated illness severity scores for decision support in the critically ill
Open Access
- 15 August 2019
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in npj Digital Medicine
- Vol. 2 (1) , 1-8
Abstract
Illness severity scores are regularly employed for quality improvement and benchmarking in the intensive care unit, but poor generalization performance, particularly with respect to probability calibration, has limited their use for decision support. These models tend to perform worse in patients at a high risk for mortality. We hypothesized that a sequential modeling approach wherein an initial regression model assigns risk and all patients deemed high risk then have their risk quantified by a second, high-risk-specific, regression model would result in a model with superior calibration across the risk spectrum. We compared this approach to a logistic regression model and a sophisticated machine learning approach, the gradient boosting machine. The sequential approach did not have an effect on the receiver operating characteristic curve or the precision-recall curve but resulted in improved reliability curves. The gradient boosting machine achieved a small improvement in discrimination performance and was similarly calibrated to the sequential models.Keywords
Funding Information
- U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (EB017205)
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Calibration of Risk Prediction ModelsMedical Decision Making, 2014
- Comparison of the Mortality Probability Admission Model III, National Quality Forum, and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation IV Hospital Mortality ModelsCritical Care Medicine, 2014
- Severity Scoring in the Critically IIIChest, 2012
- Severity Scoring in the Critically IllChest, 2012
- Intensive care unit length of stay: Benchmarking based on Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) IV*Critical Care Medicine, 2006
- Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) IV: Hospital mortality assessment for today’s critically ill patients*Critical Care Medicine, 2006
- SAPS 3—From evaluation of the patient to evaluation of the intensive care unit. Part 2: Development of a prognostic model for hospital mortality at ICU admissionIntensive Care Medicine, 2005
- The SOFA (Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failureIntensive Care Medicine, 1996
- Intensive Care Societyʼs Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE II) study in Britain and IrelandCritical Care Medicine, 1994
- Intensive Care Society's APACHE II study in Britain and Ireland--II: Outcome comparisons of intensive care units after adjustment for case mix by the American APACHE II method.BMJ, 1993