How Norms Depend on the Presence and Status of Observers: The Relational Contingency of Everyday Behaviors in 90 Societies
Open Access
- 27 August 2026
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in American Sociological Review
- Vol. 91 (5) , 709-730
Abstract
Norms are fundamental to social life, but basic questions about how they are affected by social context remain. Specifically, how do normative constraints depend on the presence and status of observers, and how do such relational contingencies vary across cultures? Using data from more than 25,000 individuals across 90 societies, we test several hypotheses linking normative constraints on everyday behaviors (like arguing, laughing, cursing, kissing, and crying), to the presence and status of observers. We find that behaviors widely viewed as appropriate in private become more constrained in the presence of others (an observer effect), and even more so when those others are higher in status (a status effect). Both observer and status effects are culturally universal, but the observer effect shows more variation across cultures. In particular, we find that observer effects are larger in societies that emphasize individualizing moral foundations, that is, avoiding harm and unfairness to others, because these societies are more permissive of actions when others are not around. The relative stability of status effects across cultural contexts suggests a universal tendency to defer in social hierarchies. These findings shed light on the relational contingency of everyday norms and underscore the role of such norms in the maintenance of social order and reproduction of inequality.Keywords
Funding Information
- the Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation (grant no. 2022.0191)
- McCausland College of Arts and Sciences
- HSE Basic Research Program (HSE-BR-2025-52)
- NextGenerationEU (BG-RRP-2.004-0007-C01)
- John Templeton Foundation (62631)
- Youth Innovation Promotion Association of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (2023095)
- Open University of Israel (48766)
- Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JP21K02983)
- Narodowe Centrum Nauki (2019/35/B/HS6/01421)
- National Research, Development and Innovation Office (NKFIH-OTKA-K 135963)
- Australian National University
- Vetenskapsrådet
- Shota Rustaveli National Science Foundation (FR-22-15319)
- Science Fund of the Republic of Serbia (7744418)
- CIS—Centro de Investigação e Intervenção Social
- Grantová Agentura České Republiky (GA23-06170S)
- DigiWELL (CZ.02.01.01/00/22_008/0004583)
This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- Perceptions of the appropriate response to norm violation in 57 societiesNature Communications, 2021
- Social norm enforcement in ethnically diverse communitiesProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2018
- The Sanctioning Dilemma: A Quasi-Experiment on Social Norm Enforcement in the TrainEuropean Sociological Review, 2016
- Changing climates of conflict: A social network experiment in 56 schoolsProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2016
- Measuring Social Value OrientationJudgment and Decision Making, 2011
- Mapping the moral domain.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2011
- Centering predictor variables in cross-sectional multilevel models: A new look at an old issue.Psychological Methods, 2007
- The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment.Psychological Review, 2001
- Behavioral appropriateness and situational constraint as dimensions of social behavior.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1974
- Embarrassment and Social Organization.1963