Prospective comparison of short-term convalescence: laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus open radical retropubic prostatectomy
Authors:
- Christian P PavlovichCPChristian P Pavlovich
- Thomas S HsuTHThomas S Hsu
- Wendy SullivanWSWendy Sullivan
- L.I-Ming SuLSL.I-Ming Su
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Laparoscopic and Robot Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Establishment of a Structured Program and Preliminary Analysis of OutcomesJournal of Urology, 2002
- Radical Prostatectomy by the Retropubic, Perineal and Laparoscopic Approach: 12 Years of Experience in One CenterEuropean Urology, 2002
- Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: assessment after 550 proceduresCritical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology, 2002
- PERIOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS OF LAPAROSCOPIC RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY: THE MONTSOURIS 3-YEAR EXPERIENCEJournal of Urology, 2002
- LAPAROSCOPIC RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY WITH THE HEILBRONN TECHNIQUE: AN ANALYSIS OF THE FIRST 180 CASESJournal of Urology, 2001
- INTRAOPERATIVE AND POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS OF RADICAL RETROPUBIC PROSTATECTOMY IN A CONSECUTIVE SERIES OF 1,000 CASESJournal of Urology, 2001
- THE CASE FOR LAPAROSCOPIC ADRENALECTOMYJournal of Urology, 2001
- LAPAROSCOPIC RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY: IS IT FEASIBLE AND REASONABLE?Urologic Clinics of North America, 2001
- LAPAROSCOPIC VERSUS OPEN RADICAL NEPHRECTOMY: A 9-YEAR EXPERIENCEJournal of Urology, 2000
- Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy: Limited Benefit of Autologous Blood DonationJournal of Urology, 1995