Early Changes in Kidney Transplantation following Implementation of the Increasing Organ Transplant Access Model
- 18 September 2026
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Abstract
Background: The Increasing Organ Transplant Access (IOTA) model is a mandatory experimental payment model that aims to improve kidney transplant access using financial incentives and penalties for transplant centers randomized to model participation, based primarily on growth in transplant volume. Methods: We used national transplant registry data to conduct a retrospective cohort study of US kidney transplant centers. We identified centers randomized to IOTA participation based on the published list of center participants. Using a difference-in-differences approach, we compared IOTA participants with nonparticipants on changes in overall, deceased donor, and living donor kidney transplant volume per 30 days in the period before IOTA randomization status was announced versus the 9 months following IOTA implementation. Separately among IOTA participants and among nonparticipants, we compared the proportional change in transplant volume when stratifying centers by pre-IOTA transplant volume, organ offer acceptance rate, and transplant rate ratio. Results: Among 177 included centers, 97 (55%) were IOTA participants and 80 (45%) nonparticipants. Most IOTA participants (53%) and nonparticipants (55%) experienced a fall in overall transplant volume after model implementation. However, IOTA participants exhibited a 5% increase in transplant volume per 30 days, whereas nonparticipants exhibited a 3% decrease ( P = 0.01). The difference between groups was seen for deceased donor transplants (participants +5% versus nonparticipants −9%, P < 0.001), while living donor transplants rose in both groups (+7 versus +19%, P = 0.24). Among IOTA participants, there were no statistically significant differences in changes in transplant volume when comparing centers categorized by pre-IOTA transplant volume, organ offer acceptance rate, or transplant rate ratio. Conclusions: Centers randomized to IOTA participation outperformed model nonparticipants in changes in kidney transplant volume after model implementation, driven by an increase in deceased donor transplant volume among model participants but a fall among nonparticipants.Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Engaging Dialysis Teams in Shared Decision-Making Conversations With Patients to Improve Rates of Kidney TransplantationKidney Medicine, 2026
- Quantifying Center-level Aggressiveness in Transplanting Suboptimal, Deceased Donor Kidneys in the United StatesTransplantation Direct, 2026
- Acceptance of High Kidney Donor Profile Index Kidneys Among Consented CandidatesKidney International Reports, 2025
- OPTN/SRTR 2023 Annual Data Report: KidneyAmerican Journal of Transplantation, 2025
- Disparities in Kidney Transplant Waitlisting Among Young Patients Without Medical ComorbiditiesJAMA Internal Medicine, 2023
- Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services' Models to Improve Late-stage Chronic Kidney Disease and End-stage Renal Disease Care: Leveraging Nephrology Payment Policy to Achieve ValueAdvances in Chronic Kidney Disease, 2022
- National Variation in Increased Infectious Risk Kidney Offer AcceptanceTransplantation, 2019
- Big Data in Organ Transplantation: Registries and Administrative ClaimsAmerican Journal of Transplantation, 2014
- Assessment of Variation in Live Donor Kidney Transplantation Across Transplant Centers in the United StatesTransplantation, 2011
- A Comprehensive Risk Quantification Score for Deceased Donor Kidneys: The Kidney Donor Risk IndexTransplantation, 2009