To measure or not to measure TFP growth? A reply to Mahadevan
Authors:
- Jesus FelipeJFJesus Felipe
- J.S.L. McCombieJMJ.S.L. McCombie
- 1 June 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Oxford Development Studies
- Vol. 32 (2) , 321-327
Abstract
(2004). To measure or not to measure TFP growth? A reply to Mahadevan. Oxford Development Studies: Vol. 32, No. 2, pp. 321-327.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Aggregation in Production Functions: What Applied Economists should KnowMetroeconomica, 2003
- Retrospectives Whatever Happened to the Cambridge Capital Theory Controversies?Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2003
- What Explains the Industrial Revolution in East Asia? Evidence From the Factor MarketsAmerican Economic Review, 2002
- A Problem with Some Estimations and Interpretations of the Mark-up in Manufacturing IndustryInternational Review of Applied Economics, 2002
- Endogenous Growth, Increasing Returns and Externalities: An Alternative Interpretation of the EvidenceMetroeconomica, 2001
- Why do Aggregate Production Functions Work? Fisher’s simulations, Shaikh’s identity and some new resultsInternational Review of Applied Economics, 2001
- On the Myth and Mystery of Singapore’s ‘Zero TFP’Asian Economic Journal, 2000
- Wan's “New Approach” to Technical Change: A CommentJournal of Comparative Economics, 1999
- Notes on Growth AccountingJournal of Economic Growth, 1999
- The Explanation of Productivity ChangeReview of Economic Studies, 1967