Clinical and Cost-Effectiveness of an Online Parent-Directed Behavioural Sleep Intervention in addition to Standard Care for Sleep Problems in Children with Epilepsy in the UK: the CASTLE Sleep-E Multicentre, Randomised Controlled Trial
Authors:
- Paul GringrasPGPaul Gringras
- H SaronHSH Saron
Preprint
Abstract
Objectives: Sleep problems are common in children with epilepsy. We aimed to evaluate the clinical effectiveness and incremental cost-effectiveness of an online resource for parents of children with epilepsy (CASTLE Online Sleep Intervention, or COSI) combined with standard care (SC) versus SC alone over six months. Design: We conducted a multicentre, parallel-group, unblinded, randomised controlled trial with an internal pilot. Setting: 26 UK NHS paediatric epilepsy outpatient clinics. Participants: Children aged 4–12 years with clinician-confirmed epilepsy and caregiver-reported sleep problems. Interventions: Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) via a computer-generated minimisation algorithm to SC or SC plus COSI. Main outcome measures: The primary outcome, assessed at three months, was the Children’s Sleep Habits Questionnaire (CSHQ). Cost-effectiveness was estimated at six months, with utilities from the Child Health Utility 9-Dimensions Index and costs from an NHS and Personal Social Services perspective. Safety analyses included all randomised participants. Analyses were performed on an intention to treat basis. Results: 85 children were enrolled between 30.08.2022 and 18.10. 2023, (42 SC; 43 SC+COSI). At three months, the adjusted mean CSHQ difference between SC+COSI and SC was 3.00 (95% CI 0.06–5.93; p=0.05), indicating no significant superiority. No adverse events were reported. Children in the SC+COSI group showed a mean 16.5-minute reduction in sleep onset latency and parents increased their knowledge. Only 23 (53%) families accessed the core online materials. Incremental mean cost of SC+COSI was £1,232 (95% credibility interval £535–£3,455) with a mean incremental QALY of 0.00 (95% CI -0.03 to 0.04), yielding an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of £433,167 per QALY gained a (0.04 probability of being cost-effective at the £30,000/QALY threshold). Conclusions: An online Parent-Directed Behavioural Sleep Intervention did not reduce parent-rated sleep problems in children with epilepsy in the NHS context. However, improved objective sleep onset latency and enhanced parental knowledge suggest that the underlying behaviour change techniques have merit. Blended delivery through specialist nurses or similar support may improve engagement and outcomes. Trial registration: ISRCTN13202325. Funding: NIHR Programme Grant for Applied Research RP-PG-0615-20007.Keywords
This publication has 95 references indexed in Scilit:
- What difference does multiple imputation make in longitudinal modeling of EQ-5D-5L data? Empirical analyses of simulated and observed missing data patternsQuality of Life Research, 2021
- Data Analysis2016
- Multiple imputation to deal with missing EQ-5D-3L data: Should we impute individual domains or the actual index?Quality of Life Research, 2014
- Bayesian models for cost‐effectiveness analysis in the presence of structural zero costsStatistics in Medicine, 2013
- Feasibility, reliability, and validity of the EQ-5D-Y: results from a multinational studyQuality of Life Research, 2010
- How Many Imputations are Really Needed? Some Practical Clarifications of Multiple Imputation TheoryPrevention Science, 2007
- Estimating mean QALYs in trial‐based cost‐effectiveness analysis: the importance of controlling for baseline utilityHealth Economics, 2004
- Missing.... presumed at random: cost‐analysis of incomplete dataHealth Economics, 2002
- Representing uncertainty: the role of cost‐effectiveness acceptability curvesHealth Economics, 2001
- Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys1987