Reply to “Comment on ‘Arbitrated quantum-signature scheme’ ”
Author:
- 28 July 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Physical Society (APS) in Physical Review A
- Vol. 78 (1) , 016301
Abstract
To reply to the Comment on our original paper entitled “Arbitrated quantum-signature scheme” [Phys. Rev. A 65, 042312 (2002)], we present more detailed presentations and proofs of the quantum-signature scheme in our paper. We feel our further investigation has shown that the original quantum-signature scheme is secure and operationally well defined. In addition, proofs illustrate that the quantum-signature scheme with unknown quantum states is also suitable in principle.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comment on “Arbitrated quantum-signature scheme”Physical Review A, 2008
- Local Distinguishability of Multipartite Unitary OperationsPhysical Review Letters, 2008
- Optimal discrimination of quantum operationsPhysical Review A, 2005
- Arbitrated quantum signature scheme with message recoveryPhysics Letters A, 2004
- Secure Communication Using Mesoscopic Coherent StatesPhysical Review Letters, 2003
- Optimal encryption of quantum bitsPhysical Review A, 2003
- Arbitrated quantum-signature schemePhysical Review A, 2002
- Statistical Distinguishability between Unitary OperationsPhysical Review Letters, 2001
- Quantum FingerprintingPhysical Review Letters, 2001
- Quantum secret sharingPhysical Review A, 1999